Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Bitz

Guys,
That goes for me as well. I would like to get in.

Mark

- Original Message -
From: Vaidya, Raghavendra (CORP, GEITC) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:43 AM
Subject: RE: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor


 Guys,
 I am one of the users of FOP for a very long time.
 I would like to get involved in this project as developer, if you guys
start
 it
 regards
 Vaidya

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:39 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor


 Hi everybody,

   this discussion is getting too esoteric. I am willing to put effort
 into a new project as I have stated before. It basically depends on if
 we are able to gather a strong enough team. However, I think we should
 soon move the discussion somewhere else rather than polluting fop-dev.
 Any suggestions? Interested?

 Marc

 - Original Message -
 From: Mark Bitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Monday, September 30, 2002 4:39 pm
 Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

  Hi,
  I agree with Marc. It's not robust enough and combersome to figure
  out.
  Mark
 
  - Original Message -
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:05 AM
  Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
 
 
   Hi,
  
 I checked out XSLfast. It's a nice start. But not advanced
  enough for
   professional print in my opinion.
  
   Marc
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Oleg Tkachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Date: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:50 pm
   Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Exactly, i wasnt intending to suggest that you guys pick
  this
work up. But
 this forum seems the best to maybe chat about it and even
  spin
another group off. Plus there is lots of expertise out there
  and
I may have missed
 a piece of software.
btw, guys from jCatalog, which actually developed fop's awt
  viewer
ended up
with xslfast, see
http://www.jcatalog.com/products/xslfast/index.htm. I
cherish a hope *someday* our clumsy awt viewer will grow into
  a
full-fledged
xsl editor :)
   
--
Oleg Tkachenko
Multiconn International, Israel
   
   
---
  
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
  
  
   -
  
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
  ---
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE ALONG WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
 ADDRESSEE and may contain confidential and privileged information.
 If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
 you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
 communication is strictly Prohibited.
 If you have received this message by error, please notify us
 immediately, return the original mail to the sender and delete the
 message from your system.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Bitz

Hi, 
I agree with Marc. It's not robust enough and combersome to figure out.

Mark

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor


 Hi,
 
   I checked out XSLfast. It's a nice start. But not advanced enough for 
 professional print in my opinion.
 
 Marc
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Oleg Tkachenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:50 pm
 Subject: Re: Antwort: fo wysiwig editor
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Exactly, i wasnt intending to suggest that you guys pick this 
  work up. But
   this forum seems the best to maybe chat about it and even spin 
  another group off. Plus there is lots of expertise out there and 
  I may have missed
   a piece of software.
  btw, guys from jCatalog, which actually developed fop's awt viewer 
  ended up 
  with xslfast, see  
  http://www.jcatalog.com/products/xslfast/index.htm. I 
  cherish a hope *someday* our clumsy awt viewer will grow into a 
  full-fledged 
  xsl editor :)
  
  -- 
  Oleg Tkachenko
  Multiconn International, Israel
  
  
  ---
  --
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: FOP vs RenderX

2002-03-26 Thread Mark Bitz

Patrick,
I wish that FOP also had the keep-with-next feature working, luckily, I
don't think for this particular application it's going to be as crucial, we
are only doing 1-up product sheets. I have been working with FOP for about a
year, maybe a year and a half, and I am just starting to understand the
basics of FOP (I think!), but only becuase there are so many applications
and so much it can do.  So, I think I am hearing that speed is an issue
HUGE. FOP is much faster. What about functionality?

Mark



- Original Message -
From: Patrick Andries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: FOP vs RenderX


 To be frank, although I have the same experience as Matt as far as speed
 (or lack thereof) of XEP is concerned, XEP is pleasant to work with
 (more syntax checking) and does support many more features (among which
 the absolutely essential keep-with-next for any professional looking
 document).

 I hear often that this may not be available soon in FOP, what does this
 mean a month, two months ?

 Patrick



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: FOP vs RenderX

2002-03-26 Thread Mark Bitz

It sounds as if you are more up-to-date on the keep-with-next status than I
am, you may very well be right. I will check that out and repost.

Mark

- Original Message -
From: Matt Savino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: FOP vs RenderX


 I thought keep-together-with-next worked at the row level on .20.3. (W/o
 going into an endless loop like .20.2 did if the selected group of rows
 happened to span more than a page.) What is the final word on this?

 -Matt


 Patrick Andries wrote:
 
  To be frank, although I have the same experience as Matt as far as speed
  (or lack thereof) of XEP is concerned, XEP is pleasant to work with
  (more syntax checking) and does support many more features (among which
  the absolutely essential keep-with-next for any professional looking
  document).
 
  I hear often that this may not be available soon in FOP, what does this
  mean a month, two months ?
 
  Patrick
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




FOP vs RenderX

2002-03-25 Thread Mark Bitz



I was wondering if anybody had done any comparisons 
of FOP vs XEP (RenderX's engine). Or if anybody knows where I can find any 
such comparisons. RenderX took their comparison down off of their web site 
and I am trying to fend off a potential XEP solution in my company. I would 
rather use FOP and a comparison may be very helpful.

Mark







Re: JAVA_HOME

2002-03-15 Thread Mark Bitz

Jamie,
I will assume that your running on a windows platfrom since you ran the
runtest.bat file. I don't have a windows 95/98/NT machine in front of me,
but they are probably close to this procedure.

you need to set an environment variable call JAVA_HOME to the subdirectory
in which your jsdk is installed..

from the desktop:
you can set an environment variable in windows 2000 by:

right clicking on my computer and selecting properties
then
click on the advanced tap at the top,
then
click on the environment variables button
then
click on the New button under system variables window
and type in the variable name JAVA_HOME
then under the variable value type in the subdirectory that you installed
your java program...
(ie.. i am using j2sdk1.4.0-rc so I would type in c:\j2sdk1.4.0-rc)
then click on ok..

to verify that your environment variable got installed you can open a DOS
session and type set at the prompt. This will list out all the environment
variables.

from the dos prompt you can set the JAVA_HOME environment variable also,
however, the scope of the variable will only last for that DOS session that
you set the variable in. If you close that DOS windows the variable also
goes away.
from the DOS prompt type

set JAVA_HOME=c:\j2sdk1.4.0-rc

this will set the JAVA_HOME environment variable, but it will only be for
current DOS session.

hope this helps.

Mark


- Original Message -
From: Jaime Jimenez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:33 AM
Subject: JAVA_HOME


Hi,

First of all, sorry for my english, because is not very well.

My problem is this, when I want execute the archive runtest.bat, the error
is this :
Fop Test

ERROR: JAVA_HOME not found in your environment.
Please, set the JAVA_HOME variable in your environment to match the
location of the Java Virtual Machine you want to use.

Can you explain me how to resolve this problem.

thks
jaime



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: FOP-GUI

2002-03-06 Thread Mark Bitz

an FOP-GUI that would do what? Can you be more descriptive.
- Original Message -
From: Adnan Zelkanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FOP DEV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 3:56 AM
Subject: FOP-GUI


 Hello volks,

 does anybody know if there is a FOP-GUI on the internet created by
someone?
 Because, command line sucks.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Sorry, Send mail agein(vertical line between column and column)

2002-03-06 Thread Mark Bitz
The only way I got this to work was to insert an image of a vertical line
between the 2 column. So actually I made it 3 columns with the middle column
being really small. It's a quick fix and it worked for me.

- Original Message -
From: "Yuko Nakayama" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:52 AM
Subject: Sorry, Send mail agein(vertical line between column and column)


 Hello.

 Sorry, I Send a mail agein.

 My FO have 2 columns in region-body.(column-gap is 0.25in)
 I want to draw vertical line, between column and column.
 Please tell me how to draw a vertical line.

 PS:
 vertical line's height equals region-body's height.
 Region-body's height changes dynamically.

 thanks.

 Yuko Nakayama




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]