Ilya,
NOTE: This message does not reflect a decision of the FOP Development
Team. Rather it is my own thoughts on the subject. If there are any
mistakes or inaccuracies in my thinking or reasoning, I hope the FOP
Team will let us know. My goal is to give Ilya and other an answer on
this importa
s are greately appreciated. It would help me to decide, if i
should go FOP.
Regards,
Ilya
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message ---
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:16:54 +0100 (MET)
From: "Ilya Khandamirov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FOP status
Hi,
I
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22027
FOP Status graphic needs update
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22027
FOP Status graphic needs update
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-31 16:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=7607)
FOP Status img "track.png" updated (includes laye
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22027
FOP Status graphic needs update
Summary: FOP Status graphic needs update
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: All
URL: http://xml.apache.org/fop/status.html
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Se
ision
1.47.2.3 +27 -53 xml-fop/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-fop/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.47.2.2
retrieving revision 1.47.2.3
diff -u -r1.47.2.2 -r1.47.2.3
--- STATUS5 May 2002 15:49:50
jeremias02/05/05 08:52:35
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
Updated committer list.
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +8 -3 xml-fop/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-fop/STATUS,v
jeremias02/05/05 08:49:50
Modified:.Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain STATUS
Log:
Updated committer list.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.47.2.2 +3 -0 xml-fop/STATUS
Index: STATUS
productive. I just need to get my SSH set up (new password,
basically) and I'll be ready to develop on FOP in short order. :-)
Arved
-Original Message-
From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 10, 2002 6:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FOP Status
Fop Status -
Fop Status - April 10
The layout process remains the critical path to the further development of
properties and elements.
Many other areas are getting attention, such as configuration and
documentation.
Development
---
done:
understanding docs - Cyril, Peter, Keiron, Karen
added
keiron 02/03/05 06:39:45
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
updated current status
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +14 -29xml-fop/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-fop/STATUS,v
Maintenance Branch
Thanks to the good work by Christian we have a maintenance release
incorporating fixes and various patches.
The final version of 0.20.3 will be announced soon (I think).
Development
Initial development of new layout managers, area tree and renderers.
Altered xml handling.
A
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:36:51 +0200, Keiron Liddle wrote:
>Fonts
>- some improvements in font handling, naming
I think PDFGraphics2D may need methods added to it that allows a user to specify:
1) Which True Type fonts to map to which Type 1 fonts.
A user might want to display on his local mon
This is the current status of FOP.
Improvements in the right areas should make it much easier for people to
understand the code without in depth knowledge.
For the current aim of FOP, basic conformance, the layout is very
important.
To keep the product usable for users we need better communicatio
14 matches
Mail list logo
