I agree as well.
Regards, Simon
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I think, you are right. They should be abstract.
On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an abstract
class? Any reason why you made it
Done. Thanks both for the quick response.
Glen
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree as well.
Regards, Simon
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:39:14AM +0100, Jeremias
Maerki wrote:
I think, you are right. They should be abstract.
On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
I think, you are right. They should be abstract.
On 04.01.2005 00:47:29 Glen Mazza wrote:
Any problem with making fo.InlineLevel an abstract
class? Any reason why you made it instantiable--or
was this just an oversight? (Actually, anyone know
why we're not making FObj and FObjMixed abstract
