Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-09 Thread Simon Pepping
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:43:51PM -0800, Clay Leeds wrote: I suspect this could be a problem for the Forrest site-generation process[1]: Specifying menus with book.xml Historically, menus in Forrest have been generated from a book.xml file, one per directory. This mechanism is

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-09 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 9, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Simon Pepping wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:43:51PM -0800, Clay Leeds wrote: I suspect this could be a problem for the Forrest site-generation process[1]: Specifying menus with book.xml Historically, menus in Forrest have been generated from a book.xml file,

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-08 Thread Simon Pepping
Clay, On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:48:23PM -0800, Clay Leeds wrote: Simon, Does the book.xml file in your DnI section serve any specific purpose (DnI-related), or is it to follow the common coding/forrest convention? I ask, because the use of book.xml is deprecated in Forrest-0.6 in favor

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-08 Thread Clay Leeds
On Nov 8, 2004, at 12:48 PM, Simon Pepping wrote: Clay, On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:48:23PM -0800, Clay Leeds wrote: Simon, Does the book.xml file in your DnI section serve any specific purpose (DnI-related), or is it to follow the common coding/forrest convention? I ask, because the use of

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/dev book.xml

2004-11-07 Thread Clay Leeds
Simon, Does the book.xml file in your DnI section serve any specific purpose (DnI-related), or is it to follow the common coding/forrest convention? I ask, because the use of book.xml is deprecated in Forrest-0.6 in favor of the site-wide src/documentation/content/xdocs/site.xml file. On Nov