Thanks. I did not know about the change. It certainly is a better
writing style.
I am still finishing the details of my documentation. After that I
want to work on the layout.
Regards, Simon
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:20:50PM -0700, Glen Mazza wrote:
Yes, the way I see it, one of FOP's
Oh please do...
--- Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After that I
want to work on the layout.
Regards, Simon
When I render an fo file that is generated with the docbook
stylesheets, I get this validation error:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error(2/12476): fox:outline is not a valid child
element of fo:root.
org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Error(2/12476):
Simon Pepping wrote:
The code in Root shows that fox:bookmarks is the only allowed fox
child of fo:root. It is not clear that that is true. The web page
extensions.html does not even mention fox:bookmarks. The example file
examples/fo/basic/pdfoutline.fo clearly embeds fox:outline elements in
Yes, the way I see it, one of FOP's successes will be
our close adherence to JAXP. Another one will be a
very strict and solid FO validation component--a firm
handshake that hopefully will paint FOP as a
Tomcat-like reference implementation for XSL.
BTW, Simon, and everyone else, there's about
