Hi Clay:
I was looking at the compliance page on a totally unrelated topic, and
noticed that the property font-variant (Sec. 7.8.8) is listed as no.
When it is convenient, that should probably be changed to partial with
comments similar to the following:
1. True small-caps (glyph substitution)
Victor,
On Oct 28, 2004, at 12:52 PM, Victor Mote wrote:
Hi Clay:
I was looking at the compliance page on a totally unrelated topic, and
noticed that the property font-variant (Sec. 7.8.8) is listed as
no.
When it is convenient, that should probably be changed to partial
with
comments similar
Clay Leeds wrote:
Unfortunately, I still have a few problems (see [1]), including a
rather gaping hole in the FOP Compliance page (it doesn't show *any*
content--d'oh!). I'm also working on some problems with various
problems in the alt.design portion of the web site. The problems are
most
Clay Leeds wrote:
Unfortunately, I still have a few problems (see [1]),
including a rather gaping hole in the FOP Compliance page (it
doesn't show *any* content--d'oh!). I'm also working on some
...
Actually, if you could help me a bit to figure out what
happened with the compliance
On Oct 28, 2004, at 2:43 PM, Victor Mote wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
Unfortunately, I still have a few problems (see [1]),
including a rather gaping hole in the FOP Compliance page (it
doesn't show *any* content--d'oh!). I'm also working on some
...
Actually, if you could help me a bit to figure out
