On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 17:39, Victor Mote wrote:
> The purpose of the 13325 patch was to get the pdf generation working again.
> Christian tried to apply it, but said that he got errors. I reviewed it,
> couldn't see anything obviously wrong with it. However, I am not sure what
> the nature of the e
Keiron Liddle wrote:
> I think time would be better spent at the moment updating the content.
> Eventually forrest should be easy and not something that you really need
> to understand in depth.
Very good. That made sense to me as well, but I felt like a bit of a shirker
to leave that work to you
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 15:56, Victor Mote wrote:
> Questions:
> 1. Are these things that need to be done in FOP or that need to be done in
> Forrest?
Forrest.
The dtd validation is important since it makes it a lot easier to know
if the xml docs are correct.
I figured out the dtd, always helps to r
Keiron:
I see your commit of this document. Thanks, especially since there were some
implementation details that I left to you. Not surprisingly, those details
are related to your following note:
> Needs adjusting to get the colours in the table cells and dtd validation.
Questions:
1. Are these
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14408
[PATCH] XSL-FO Compliance Document
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14408
[PATCH] XSL-FO Compliance Document
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-09 10:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=3791)
tar file containing 4 documents (xml, dtd, xslt, html) for XSL-FO Comp
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14408
[PATCH] XSL-FO Compliance Document
Summary: [PATCH] XSL-FO Compliance Document
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority:
