Re: [discuss] FW: FOP License Issue Inquiry

2002-04-09 Thread Sander Vesik
: Re: License Issue Inquiry From: Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am taking it upon myself to submit a query regarding the Apache Software License that FOP is licensed under. There is some big interest currently in the OOo (OpenOffice.org) community with respect to finding a cross

Re: License Issue Inquiry

2002-04-05 Thread John Austin
On Thursday 04 April 2002 14:47, you wrote: At 08:34 AM 4/4/02 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: like it could be the answer. The only question is, can OOo use it? license of it's software. My question is why does OOo require FOP to be LGPLed? You can integrate it into OpenOffice without it

License Issue Inquiry

2002-04-04 Thread Charles Marcus
Greetings, I hope this is the proper place for this question to be submitted. If not, please direct me to where I need to go. I am taking it upon myself to submit a query regarding the Apache Software License that FOP is licensed under. There is some big interest currently in the OOo

Re: License Issue Inquiry

2002-04-04 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
I'm moving this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I think it's of interest to all. If not, please excuse me. From: Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greetings, I hope this is the proper place for this question to be submitted. If not, please direct me to where I need to go. I am taking it upon

Re: License Issue Inquiry

2002-04-04 Thread Roland
At 08:34 AM 4/4/02 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote: like it could be the answer. The only question is, can OOo use it? OOo requires that anything integrated into its source code be made available to them under the terms of the LGPL license. The LGPL license is much more restrictive than the Apache