> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> it would be easy to determine col number in Table.addChild. This number
> could then be replaced in TableColumn.doSetup only if Column Number has
> actually been specified in the FO. I'm not sure I would be keen on
>
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess the riddle I'm still trying to solve is:
How do I access the LM's for the subsequent rows at this point?
AFAICT, I have overlooked (at least) the following note in the spec (6.7.1
Ta
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Another detail overlooked is the column-number property, ...
Which is, for the moment quite ... unimplemented (--should've checked this
sooner :) ), so that explains why the spec isn't being followed when setting
the default value to 0.
This makes me think that much of
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Just to keep everyone up to date about my excursions:
> Another detail overlooked is the column-number property, ...
Which is, for the moment quite ... unimplemented (--should've checked this
sooner :) ), so th
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I guess the riddle I'm still trying to solve is:
> How do I access the LM's for the subsequent rows at this point?
>
AFAICT, I have overlooked (at least) the following note in the spec (6.7.1
Table Formatting Ob
