RE: status on website

2002-05-17 Thread joseph . aloysius . gilvary
AIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: status on website

RE: status on website

2002-05-17 Thread Oleg Tkachenko
> -Original Message- > From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > According to one of the Norman Nielsen usability studies, > http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ > nearly 30% of (average) web users wont find information > if it's not immediatly visible (i.e. they don't scroll > at all).

Re: status on website

2002-05-16 Thread J.Pietschmann
Christian Geisert wrote: > Maybe put it on top of the page (or an extra page?) > I fear quite a few people won't scroll down that far ... According to one of the Norman Nielsen usability studies, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/ nearly 30% of (average) web users wont find information if it's not

Re: status on website

2002-05-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: > Hi, > > I added some status info to the website. So hopefully this will answer Cool > some peoples questions (I'm sure they will still want to know more > things that are unknown). Sure ;-) > Any comments, complaints, suggestions? (apart from my poor spelling!) Maybe

Re: status on website

2002-05-16 Thread joseph . aloysius . gilvary
Hi, Comment: Good idea. Suggestion: It probably wouldn't hurt to go ahead (on the page) and answer the inevitable, "Can you please tell me when to expect the release FOP0.20.4|FOP10 DR1 announced on your status page?" The same answer that would otherwise appear here, that is. Complaint: My co