On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:34 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
But the underlying PDF library looks quite interesting (PDFBox). Has
anyone had any experiences with it? If yes, we should add it to our
PDF post-processors list on the website, if just because it has a
better license than iText.
I
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
BTW: Is it a correct assessment that implementing this should turn out
to be far simpler than fixed page-sizes? IIC, theoretically, the whole
page-breaking algorithm can be ignored for indefinite page-heights.
getAvailableBPD() would always return, say,
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36729.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This is just a heads up on what I plan to do next. Having gained some
familiarity with the inline LMs adding support for sub/superscripts
seems like a useful feature to me. Actually the scope of this is a bit
wider as to do that properly and not as a quick fix it involves support
for the set
The warning is an indicator that there are still a few things in RTF
support that need fixing.
So is there someone who owns this class? How long has it been
out-of-sync - that is, is it in the same condition as TXTRenderer?
Also, while this is probably not the correct forum for this question,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36720.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sep 20, 2005, at 17:40, Matthew L Daniel wrote:
Hi Matthew,
The least this would do is avoid a number of unnecessary calls to
instanceof.
You're on the right track, and maybe that switch impl would be an
80/20 win over the cost of the Right Way. But that huge if-instance
case
is exactly
I am checking the rtf results with Word 2000 SP3.
Regards,
Peter Herweg
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auftrag von Matthew L Daniel
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. September 2005 17:50
An: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Betreff: Re: rtf ignoring
Yes, there are few nodes types missing, because i just added the node types,
which are implemented in rtf module.
But you are right: TableBody is implemented, but is missing in the
if-structure. I'll add it.
There is also support for ExternalGraphics, but i guess this won't work so i
did not add
On 20.09.2005 17:50:03 Matthew L Daniel wrote:
The warning is an indicator that there are still a few things in RTF
support that need fixing.
So is there someone who owns this class?
No. There are no class owners in Apache projects.
How long has it been
out-of-sync - that is, is it in
Hi,
Jeremias, Luca or Simon will probably be able to make the most sense
out of it, but if there's anyone else that can add a few comments, feel
free to do so.
(FYI: This is completely separate from my idea to move the
border-collapsing to the FOTree.)
Now, I'm still not fully at home in
12 matches
Mail list logo
