Re: Finally finalizing the FOP API

2006-02-07 Thread Jess Holle
Having just added reflection code to make my code work with 0.20.5 and 0.91 beta, I'd like to see the existing Fop() constructor continue to work as per 0.91 beta. Overall having to use reflection to maintain use of the current stable while being ready for the future is at once understandable

Re: Finally finalizing the FOP API

2006-02-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Noted, but the fact that the API is not stable has been documented in [1]. We've been pushing finalizing the API before us for a long time. The old 0.20.5 API sadly doesn't fit all the requirements that we have today. Another idea for your situation is a wrapper API that shields you from the

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38507] - Non-breaking space in PDF title output

2006-02-07 Thread Luca Furini
Manuel Mall wrote: 1. The suppress-at-line-break property can be applied to all characters. I would take the position at the moment that explicit specification of the suppress-at-line-break property is not supported and we worry about it at a later stage. I would certainly argue against just