Guys,
thanks for your inputs. That strengthens a bit the picture I have in
mind. I'm wondering if the following makes any sense:
We would have a list of page-level Knuth elements; some of those
elements would be wrapper around line-level Knuth elements. Almost every
element would contain a
Yes, that's pretty much my view of the whole thing.
On 08.03.2007 18:29:07 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Guys,
thanks for your inputs. That strengthens a bit the picture I have in
mind. I'm wondering if the following makes any sense:
We would have a list of page-level Knuth elements; some of
On Mar 8, 2007, at 18:29, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
thanks for your inputs. That strengthens a bit the picture I have in
mind. I'm wondering if the following makes any sense:
We would have a list of page-level Knuth elements; some of those
elements would be wrapper around line-level Knuth
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:32:09PM -0800, Nicol Bolas wrote:
Well, consider this.
I know what a .bat file is; I know how to use one. I don't know what a cmd
or a js startup script is. If I need to modify the .bat file, I can read
it, understand it, and use it without looking something up
I do not believe that most Windows machines came with a JavaScript
interpreter. As such, expecting a user to have to install one in order to
use FOP is an unnecessarily high bar.
However, if the 'cmd' language and the 'bat' languages are fairly identical,
feel free to change them. As long as the
JScript is one of the Windows Scripting Host languages.
It has been supported since Win9x, along with vbscript.
Nicol Bolas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/03/2007 01:19 PM
Please respond to fop-dev
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
cc:
Subject:Re: [2007/02/11]
