Re: Percentages in CommonAbsolutePosition?

2007-03-27 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Andreas, Andreas L Delmelle a écrit : On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I understand you correctly, what you're saying is that if the fixed positioned block's nearest ref-area is not initially visible, then the top/left/etc. properties should be taken WRT the

Re: More on border and padding conditionalities

2007-03-27 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Andreas, Andreas L Delmelle a écrit : On Mar 26, 2007, at 16:48, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Vincent, I'm having a lot of fun playing with border and padding conditionalities... snip / I think the padding should actually not be discarded on the second page. It would if the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41667] - ImageProvider should be overridable in ImageFactory

2007-03-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41667. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Footnotes in the float branch

2007-03-27 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Luca, Luca Furini a écrit : Hi all I recently had the time (and the pleasure) to look at before-float implementation branch, and I played a bit with it. I focused on the handling of footnotes, as I noticed that sometimes they were placed on a page following their citations without a

Re: Footnotes in the float branch

2007-03-27 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Grmblmblm... and the attached fo file, of course... Vincent Vincent Hennebert a écrit : Hi Luca, Luca Furini a écrit : Hi all I recently had the time (and the pleasure) to look at before-float implementation branch, and I played a bit with it. I focused on the handling of footnotes, as

Re: Percentages in CommonAbsolutePosition?

2007-03-27 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi guys, Diving into the viewport/reference-area relation some more, I think what I could as well have said from the beginning was: If the nearest ancestor reference area is the region-reference-area, then the position of a fixed-positioned area in the viewport is initially identical to that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41959] New: - External links are broken if pdf is encryped

2007-03-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41959. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Percentages in CommonAbsolutePosition?

2007-03-27 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
I wrote: So I hope I'm not just adding to the confusion here... :-) ...but I probably did, because I was replying with the entire thread in mind, and the quoted text which I used as a handle certainly wasn't the most appropriate for what I wanted to say -- it just happened to be the last

Re: Footnotes in the float branch

2007-03-27 Thread Luca Furini
Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Luca, Hi! I had a look at your patch and have several comments: - I see you re-enabled the noBreakBetween method; I don't think it's a good solution because it artificially prevents some nodes to be created, which even if bad may be necessary for some complex

Re: Percentages in CommonAbsolutePosition?

2007-03-27 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:32, Vincent Hennebert wrote: snip / That's why I suspect that for fixed the ref-area to be considered should be the region-area (for paged media), unlike for absolute where this should be the nearest ancestor ref-area. There won't be any difference in most cases

Re: More on border and padding conditionalities

2007-03-27 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:47, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Andreas L Delmelle a écrit : On Mar 26, 2007, at 16:48, Vincent Hennebert wrote: I'm having a lot of fun playing with border and padding conditionalities... snip / Just a sanity check: aren't you confusing padding-* with space-* here?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41954] - AWT Renderer fails with heap memory error

2007-03-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41954. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.