Hi Andreas,
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
On Mar 26, 2007, at 11:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand you correctly, what you're saying is that if the fixed
positioned block's nearest ref-area is not initially visible, then the
top/left/etc. properties should be taken WRT the
Hi Andreas,
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
On Mar 26, 2007, at 16:48, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I'm having a lot of fun playing with border and padding
conditionalities...
snip /
I think the padding should actually not be discarded on the second page.
It would if the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Luca,
Luca Furini a écrit :
Hi all
I recently had the time (and the pleasure) to look at before-float
implementation branch, and I played a bit with it.
I focused on the handling of footnotes, as I noticed that sometimes they
were placed on a page following their citations without a
Grmblmblm... and the attached fo file, of course...
Vincent
Vincent Hennebert a écrit :
Hi Luca,
Luca Furini a écrit :
Hi all
I recently had the time (and the pleasure) to look at before-float
implementation branch, and I played a bit with it.
I focused on the handling of footnotes, as
Hi guys,
Diving into the viewport/reference-area relation some more, I think
what I could as well have said from the beginning was: If the
nearest ancestor reference area is the region-reference-area, then
the position of a fixed-positioned area in the viewport is
initially identical to that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I wrote:
So I hope I'm not just adding to the confusion here... :-)
...but I probably did, because I was replying with the entire thread
in mind, and the quoted text which I used as a handle certainly
wasn't the most appropriate for what I wanted to say -- it just
happened to be the last
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Luca,
Hi!
I had a look at your patch and have several comments:
- I see you re-enabled the noBreakBetween method; I don't think it's
a good solution because it artificially prevents some nodes to be
created, which even if bad may be necessary for some complex
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:32, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip /
That's why I suspect that for fixed the ref-area to be considered
should be the region-area (for paged media), unlike for absolute
where
this should be the nearest ancestor ref-area. There won't be any
difference in most cases
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:47, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Andreas L Delmelle a écrit :
On Mar 26, 2007, at 16:48, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I'm having a lot of fun playing with border and padding
conditionalities...
snip /
Just a sanity check: aren't you confusing padding-* with space-*
here?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41954.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
12 matches
Mail list logo