On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:37:12PM +, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Speaking of the release, many parts of the website are largely outdated
and need a serious re-work (the Development tab, mainly). Also, any
reference to 0.20.5 should IMO be removed before releasing 1.0. 0.20.5
is a thing of
FOP devs,
Would this be suitable for a GSoC project? It is certainly not
trivial, and the candidate should have a reasonable chance of success.
Simon
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:57:47PM +, Peterdk wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering, I need a basic version of table-layout=auto. It's not yet
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2010-03-25
11:16:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your patch. I can't comment on the functionality itself, but I
noticed a few general issues:
- the new
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954
Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25163|0 |1
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954
--- Comment #5 from Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com 2010-03-25 18:10:22
UTC ---
Note the patch includes the deletion of
src/java/org/apache/fop/afp/modca/AbstractTripletStructuredObject.java. I
think the commiter will have to 'svn
