https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076
--- Comment #4 from Divakar P divaka...@thomsonreuters.com 2012-04-25
06:46:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 28673
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28673
PCL, FO for Space issue
Please find the attached FO and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076
--- Comment #6 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-25 07:01:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
A maximally minimal input FO test file is one from which nothing cannot be
removed without either removing the problem or invalidating
On 24/04/2012 15:34, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I find that Bugzilla Just Works and is easy to use. I don’t really see
the need to change as long as it’s available. What support do we need
from infra anyway? But as long as I don’t have anything to do...
Hi Vincent,
votes count on general@ only
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #15 from Unlogic unlo...@unlogic.se 2012-04-25 07:50:54 UTC ---
I took a quick look at the patch in bug 43940 and from what I can see it
replaces DecimalFormatCache with a new implementation that doesn't use
ThreadLocal at all
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51484
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Riefenstahl riefenst...@mecom.de 2012-04-25
08:16:59 UTC ---
Roger/Benjamin, I am still awaiting your input as requested
above.
Sorry for not answering this earlier.
could you provide additional input
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52778
--- Comment #4 from Luis Bernardo lmpmberna...@gmail.com 2012-04-25 08:26:08
UTC ---
Created attachment 28675
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28675
console output
an exception is thrown when processing the
On 25/04/12 08:38, Chris Bowditch wrote:
On 24/04/2012 15:34, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I find that Bugzilla Just Works and is easy to use. I don’t really see
the need to change as long as it’s available. What support do we need
from infra anyway? But as long as I don’t have anything to do...
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146
Bug #: 53146
Summary: Whitespace and Hyphenation with Zero Width Space
Product: Fop
Version: 1.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Schraitle tom_s...@web.de 2012-04-25 11:55:22 UTC
---
Created attachment 28678
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28678
FO file built with FOP 1.0
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schraitle tom_s...@web.de 2012-04-25 11:56:08 UTC
---
Created attachment 28679
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28679
FO file built with XEP 4.19 build 20110414
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076
--- Comment #7 from Dorothy Weil dorothy.w...@thomsonreuters.com 2012-04-25
12:14:03 UTC ---
Is there a way to remove me from this bug and give ownership to
troy.clea...@thomsonreuters.com
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51484
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52778
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
Bug #: 53148
Summary: [PATCH] Fop Performance degradation after upgrading
from jdk 6 u18 to u19
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076
--- Comment #8 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-25 14:06:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Is there a way to remove me from this bug and give ownership to
troy.clea...@thomsonreuters.com
i can't change the reporter field, so
On 24/04/12 16:26, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Vincent Hennebert
vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22/04/12 21:09, gad...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gadams
Date: Sun Apr 22 20:09:42 2012
New Revision: 1328963
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328963view=rev
Log:
Hi Glenn,
When committing patches submitted by contributors, you must put their
names in the commit message. See also
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#applying-patches
I reckon the email address is not all that necessary since it can easily
be retrieved from the Bugzilla entry (just my
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
ok, thanks for pointing that out; i have been marking their name in the
status.xml due-to attribute
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Glenn,
When committing patches submitted by contributors, you must put their
names in the commit message. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53146
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--- Comment #3
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
Tassos tcharou...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #17 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-25 16:30:40 UTC ---
Other than o.a.f.pdf.PDFNumber, I found two more occurrences of
DecimalFormatCache:
1. o.a.f.pdf.PDFColorHandler
2.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
--- Comment #16 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-25 16:31:48 UTC ---
Patches for bug 43490 seems to be incomplete. I will try to add what is
missing, and then test if memory leak is gone.
-Ognjen
--
Configure
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52778
Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #18 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-25 17:05:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
Other than o.a.f.pdf.PDFNumber, I found two more occurrences of
DecimalFormatCache:
1. o.a.f.pdf.PDFColorHandler
2.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #19 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2012-04-25
17:17:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(In reply to comment #17)
Other than o.a.f.pdf.PDFNumber, I found two more occurrences of
DecimalFormatCache:
1.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53052
Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Clay Leeds the.webmaes...@gmail.comwrote:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 1:36 AM, Pascal Sancho pascal.san...@takoma.fr
wrote:
But there has to be a better way. Can we, as a start, change the CSS file
xmlgraphics.css so it doesn't have body {color: white;}?
Note
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #20 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-25 22:26:51 UTC ---
Vincent,
(In reply to comment #19)
Please also see comment 13. I think some modifications to the patch are
necessary.
I don't know why
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #21 from Ognjen Blagojevic ognjen.d.blagoje...@gmail.com
2012-04-25 22:33:15 UTC ---
Glenn,
(In reply to comment #18)
just a reminder, but i will need a ICLA filed by Julien in order to apply his
patch; see comment 15
I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43940
--- Comment #22 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-25 23:27:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
Vincent,
(In reply to comment #19)
Please also see comment 13. I think some modifications to the patch are
necessary.
I
35 matches
Mail list logo
