+1
2013/4/9 Vincent Hennebert
> Probably nobody will object, but still: the usual policy is to wait
> 3 working days before applying lazy consensus.
>
> Vincent
>
>
> On 09/04/13 00:22, Luis Bernardo wrote:
> >
> > I agree and I think no one will object. So I will ask infra tomorrow
> unless
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13626634#comment-13626634
]
Szeak commented on FOP-2235:
OK, Chris, Thanks for help and sorry for my uninformed study ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Bowditch closed FOP-2235.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
This is not a bug. See FAQ:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/faq.html#blank
+1
On 08/04/2013 23:22, Luis Bernardo wrote:
I agree and I think no one will object. So I will ask infra tomorrow
unless someone expresses a different opinion.
On 4/8/13 7:39 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Vincent Hennebert
mailto:vhenneb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13626457#comment-13626457
]
Chris Bowditch commented on FOP-1099:
-
The W3C XSL-FO sub group has been suspended, so w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Szeak updated FOP-2235:
---
Attachment: test.fo
Failed 2. blank page
> Pagination failure when using initial-page-number attribute
Szeak created FOP-2235:
--
Summary: Pagination failure when using initial-page-number
attribute
Key: FOP-2235
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2235
Project: Fop
Issue Type: Bug
Co
Probably nobody will object, but still: the usual policy is to wait
3 working days before applying lazy consensus.
Vincent
On 09/04/13 00:22, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
> I agree and I think no one will object. So I will ask infra tomorrow unless
> someone expresses a different opinion.
>
> On 4/8