+1
2013/4/9 Vincent Hennebert <[email protected]> > Probably nobody will object, but still: the usual policy is to wait > 3 working days before applying lazy consensus. > > Vincent > > > On 09/04/13 00:22, Luis Bernardo wrote: > > > > I agree and I think no one will object. So I will ask infra tomorrow > unless > > someone expresses a different opinion. > > > > On 4/8/13 7:39 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Vincent Hennebert <[email protected] > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> On 29/03/13 22:49, Glenn Adams wrote: > >> > Is there a way we can stop this type of spam? For example, by > >> moderating > >> > wiki updates, or by placing stronger requirements on wiki > >> registration, > >> > write access, etc? > >> > >> Yes: > >> > >> > http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C_benefit_just_a_lot > >> > >> > >> > >> Sounds great. I propose we adopt this policy, i.e., make use of editing > >> privileges to control Wiki writes, where current > committers/contributors are > >> granted editing privileges to start, and any known, identifiable > >> (non-pseudonymous) person can request and be granted (perfunctorily) > those > >> privileges in the future, and where those privileges can be removed by > the > >> PMC if misuse occurs. > >> > >> WDYT? > >> > >> G. > > > > > -- pascal
