Probably nobody will object, but still: the usual policy is to wait
3 working days before applying lazy consensus.

Vincent


On 09/04/13 00:22, Luis Bernardo wrote:
> 
> I agree and I think no one will object. So I will ask infra tomorrow unless
> someone expresses a different opinion.
> 
> On 4/8/13 7:39 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:vhenneb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 29/03/13 22:49, Glenn Adams wrote:
>>     > Is there a way we can stop this type of spam? For example, by
>>     moderating
>>     > wiki updates, or by placing stronger requirements on wiki
>>     registration,
>>     > write access, etc?
>>
>>     Yes:
>>    
>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C_benefit_just_a_lot
>>
>>
>>
>> Sounds great. I propose we adopt this policy, i.e., make use of editing
>> privileges to control Wiki writes, where current committers/contributors are
>> granted editing privileges to start, and any known, identifiable
>> (non-pseudonymous) person can request and be granted (perfunctorily) those
>> privileges in the future, and where those privileges can be removed by the
>> PMC if misuse occurs.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> G.
> 
> 

Reply via email to