Probably nobody will object, but still: the usual policy is to wait 3 working days before applying lazy consensus.
Vincent On 09/04/13 00:22, Luis Bernardo wrote: > > I agree and I think no one will object. So I will ask infra tomorrow unless > someone expresses a different opinion. > > On 4/8/13 7:39 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Vincent Hennebert <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On 29/03/13 22:49, Glenn Adams wrote: >> > Is there a way we can stop this type of spam? For example, by >> moderating >> > wiki updates, or by placing stronger requirements on wiki >> registration, >> > write access, etc? >> >> Yes: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C_benefit_just_a_lot >> >> >> >> Sounds great. I propose we adopt this policy, i.e., make use of editing >> privileges to control Wiki writes, where current committers/contributors are >> granted editing privileges to start, and any known, identifiable >> (non-pseudonymous) person can request and be granted (perfunctorily) those >> privileges in the future, and where those privileges can be removed by the >> PMC if misuse occurs. >> >> WDYT? >> >> G. > >
