Re: Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-12-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 03.12.2007 07:10:34 Cameron McCormack wrote: > Carlos Sanchez: > > > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik > > Cameron McCormack: > > > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is > > > wrong? (It says org.apache.xmlgraphics in the POM > > > file for

Re: Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-12-02 Thread Cameron McCormack
Carlos Sanchez: > > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik Cameron McCormack: > > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is > > wrong? (It says org.apache.xmlgraphics in the POM > > file for both.) > Carlos Sanchez: > it's up to xmlgraphics project to

Re: Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-11-30 Thread Carlos Sanchez
On Nov 30, 2007 2:41 PM, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik > > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is > wrong? (It says org.apache.xmlgraphics in the POM > file for both.) it's up to xmlgraphics pr

Re: Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-11-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Carlos. Carlos Sanchez: > The best person that will help you is a user of Batik that uses Maven, Lars? > see some comments inline Cameron McCormack: > > First, should I keep the groupId as "batik"? It seems inconsistent with > > those for FOP and Commons, which are using "org.apache.xmlgraphi

Re: Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-11-29 Thread Carlos Sanchez
The best person that will help you is a user of Batik that uses Maven, Lars? see some comments inline On Nov 29, 2007 9:21 AM, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all. > > [Apologies for my wanton cross-posting.] > > Since Batik's release is coming up soon, I'd like to get the Maven

Re: Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-11-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: > Second, how do I deal with the issue of the mutual dependency between > FOP and Batik? The Batik 1.7 release will depend on Fop 0.93, but in > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xmlgraphics/fop/0.93/fop-0.93.pom > it says that FOP 0.93 depends

Maven artifacts for Batik

2007-11-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi all. [Apologies for my wanton cross-posting.] Since Batik’s release is coming up soon, I’d like to get the Maven stuff in order. Lars Trieloff helpfully provided some POMs for the 1.7beta1 release in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42320 and in that bug he says these were up