RE: Area tree format improvements

2016-08-08 Thread Jan Tosovsky
On 2016-08-07 Glenn Adams wrote: > On 2016-08-07 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > On 2016-08-05 Glenn Adams wrote: > > > On 2016-08-04 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > > > > > when implementing change bars I encountered problem with > > > > proper storing the change bar info using the current Area > > > > Tree

Re: Area tree format improvements

2016-08-07 Thread Glenn Adams
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > On 2016-08-05 Glenn Adams wrote: > > On 2016-08-04 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > > > when implementing change bars I encountered problem with > > > proper storing the change bar info using the current Area Tree > > >

RE: Area tree format improvements

2016-08-07 Thread Jan Tosovsky
On 2016-08-05 Glenn Adams wrote: > On 2016-08-04 Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > when implementing change bars I encountered problem with > > proper storing the change bar info using the current Area Tree > > vocabulary: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2640 > > > > Is it Ok to extend the

Re: Area tree format improvements

2016-08-04 Thread Glenn Adams
Firstly, the AT (area tree) output format is really only used for testing these days. You should be looking at the IF (intermediate format) output format, which presently drives all the rendering modules. Whether a proposed patch is accepted or not depends a great deal on its quality,