to be there to run.
Robert
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:20:34 +0100
From: lmpmberna...@gmail.com
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fontbox optional dependency
I applied the OTF patch (FOP-2252) since it is a large patch and
if it goes stale it will be very difficult
: lmpmberna...@gmail.com
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fontbox optional dependency
I applied the OTF patch (FOP-2252) since it is a large patch and if it
goes stale it will be very difficult to apply. However, I realized after I
applied it that it introduces a dependency
Ok, that's good to hear. Thanks Luis(!). You'd think after knowing you for over
a year now I could learn to spell your name correctly ;)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:13:28 +0100
Subject: Re: Fontbox optional dependency
From: lmpmberna...@gmail.com
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
OK, I think
.
From: gl...@skynav.com
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:40:05 -0600
Subject: Re: Fontbox optional dependency
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk
mailto:rme...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Quick question related
with the other which I plan to put forward
soon. As such, we will just be referencing an existing compiled
version of their project.
From: gl...@skynav.com
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:40:05 -0600
Subject: Re: Fontbox optional
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Quick question related to this fontbox optional dependency being added for
OTF CFF. I am guessing that to allow this to work, FOP will require the
fontbox jar to be compiled, but optional when run? If the user
be referencing an
existing compiled version of their project.
From: gl...@skynav.com
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:40:05 -0600
Subject: Re: Fontbox optional dependency
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Quick
