Thank You Jayesh and Jan for your suggestions.
Regards,
princy
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Installation-of-FOP-in-unix-tp15547834p15582742.html
Sent from the FOP - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you are starting to use FOP, can I advise you to use a more recent
version?
Version 0.20.5 is no longer in active support. 0.94 is the latest stable
version.
Regards, Jan
, MCSD, SCJP, SCWCD, PMP, IBM WAS ADM.> Date: Tue,
19 Feb 2008 06:28:22 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org> Subject: RE: Installation of FOP in unix> > >
Hi Jayesh,> > Thanks for your help.> > As you suggested I downloaded the binar
Hi Jayesh,
Thanks for your help.
As you suggested I downloaded the binary distribution and added the fop
folder in to the PATH variable.Then the error" -bash: fop.sh: command not
found" was gone .
But I was getting a different error
bad interpreter: No such file or directory. Then I came to kn
Hi Mark,
Thanks for your help.
As you suggested I added the folder in to the PATH variable.Then the error"
-bash: fop.sh: command not found" was gone .But I was getting a different
error
bad interpreter: No such file or directory. Then I came to know that this
happens when we transfer script fi
Hi Princy
>From the way you have phrased the question, it seems more of a unix
>understanding issue and less of FOP.
This is what I would do, I am using Redhat Linux the baby brother of UNIX but
you should get it.
a) anything that has *-src* in it means its usually considered a source and not
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 07:25 -0800, priby wrote:
> Hi all, I am trying to install fop in unix system. I downloaded the
> fop-0.20.5-src.tar and unzipped it in a windows machine. Then I moved
> the unzipped files to unix system inside folder /var/tmp/fop-0.20.5 .
> Then under the folder /var/tmp/fo
