- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: RTF - list-item-label encoding (was: RTF and table/column widths
(moved from fop-users))
Gesendet: Sa 04 Mär 2006 11:53:19 CET
Von: Andreas L Delmelle[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're quite right, I believe. Any changes to this will lead to a
marginal
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: RTF - list-item-label encoding (was: RTF and table/column widths
(moved from fop-users))
Gesendet: Mi 01 Mär 2006 19:22:24 CET
Von: Andreas L Delmelle[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 1, 2006, at 08:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You changed
On Mar 3, 2006, at 23:31, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Mar 1, 2006, at 19:21, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
New tiny patch proposal for this below. Nothing broke, and strictly
RTF-wise the output for list-item-label text now seems more correct
than before. Unfortunately, I lack extensive tests
On Mar 1, 2006, at 08:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You changed the Writer.write to StringBuffer operations. I'd say
that appending to a StringBuffer is much slower than writing
directly to a BufferedOutputStream. There was a comparison between
static concatenation, concatenation of Strings
On Feb 28, 2006, at 23:17, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
Is it allowed to use unicode escapes in control words? If so, the
solution could be as simple as using RTFStringConverter to escape
any 'text' if necessary.
In practice, my proposal would come down to
On that note, while
- original Nachricht
Betreff: Re: RTF - list-item-label encoding (was: RTF and table/column widths
(moved from fop-users))
Gesendet: Mi 01 Mär 2006 00:45:39 CET
Von: Andreas L Delmelle[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 28, 2006, at 23:17, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip
