I am having trouble automating an error free build of the javadocs
target in our build.xml. The problem is that I am using a RPM install
for ant (obviously I am talking Linux here). This places the ant.jar
file not into ${ant.home}/lib but into /usr/share/java. This means the
pathelement
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:03 pm, Mark C. Allman wrote:
Since you're using Linux, try a symbolic link (ln -s
/usr/share/java/ant.jar $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar )?
Mark, yes sure but that's not quite what I am after. The problem I want
to solve is to have a build.xml such that when users download the
As I typed my last e-mail, I suspected that wasn't what you were looking for (it's trivial!).
Have you tried just adding the classpath as a pathelement instead of explicitly setting individual jars? I.e.,
pathelement path=${env.CLASSPATH} /
instead of
pathelement
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36403.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant
project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes)
and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This means the
command to invoke the program is the same on Unix and Windows.
Personally I like
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37270.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+0.5 as I'm not on Unix but if it makes people's life easier like this
On 27.10.2005 15:58:45 Manuel Mall wrote:
While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant
project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes)
and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37270.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I wrote:
Manuel Mall wrote:
There is no need to expose creation of the Space/Word areas directly
to TextLayoutManager either. TextArea could easily expose an addWord
and an addSpace method instead of the monolithic setText. In the end
it probably boils down to me arguing that the
On Oct 27, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Manuel Mall wrote:
While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant
project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes)
and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This means the
command to invoke the program is the
Jeremias,
In the SpaceResolver constructor the pendingaftermarks are added to
the start of first:
first.addAll(0, breakPoss.getPendingAfterMarks());
I think they should be added to the end. Also I think the order of the
pendingaftermarks in BreakElement is wrong, or they should be added to
Would you mind handling this yourself? Adding the test case, adding
checks and possibly fixing the bug? I'm away tomorrow and the whole of
next week and I'm only just cleaning up my stuff before I go to bed. I
don't know how much time I'll have during the weekend to look into this.
Thanks!
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
