Finn,
I noticed that you extracted numeric function methods as statics into a
class of their own. Was this for aesthetic or performance reasons?
Peter
--
Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/
Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
They are in the org.apache.fop.image package. Start by looking at
ImageFactory. They're not in XML Graphics Commons, yet, but will go
there eventually.
On 28.09.2005 23:58:11 Peter Herweg wrote:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'll look into it tomorrow. Peter's last change for external-graphics in
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:48:11PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
Jeremias,
looks OK to me although a bit strange but hey...that's the spec.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:00 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've just stumbled over the testcase block_margin_inherit while
fixing problems revealed by the
[Peter]
I noticed that you extracted numeric function methods as statics into a
class of their own. Was this for aesthetic or performance reasons?
The methods in NumericOp? They are called from multiple places which
does not have anything in common. So I put the methods in NumericOp to
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 04:53 pm, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:48:11PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
Jeremias,
looks OK to me although a bit strange but hey...that's the spec.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:00 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I've just stumbled over the testcase
Finn Bock wrote:
[Peter]
I noticed that you extracted numeric function methods as statics into
a class of their own. Was this for aesthetic or performance reasons?
The methods in NumericOp? They are called from multiple places which
does not have anything in common. So I put the methods
If you don't see any replies from me at the moment, this is because it
looks like a router in San Francisco is blocking my IP traffic to the
Apache servers located in the US. That means I've got no SVN access and
it also seems to affect the mails from the mailing lists which I
currently don't get.
Fopsters,
I've always been somewhat sceptical of the new approach to page
breaking, although I was prepared to concede that it would be a great
achievement if you pulled it off.
However, the closer the development has come to fruition, the more some
of my original concerns have been
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Pepping wrote:
Maintaining FOP means maintaining a digital typesetting system means
maintaining some of the best digital typography algorithms.
I plan to resume my documenting activities in the coming months. I
look forward to the challenge to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36871.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36871.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
11 matches
Mail list logo