[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop-maintenance (in module xml-fop-maintenance) failed

2006-03-29 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2006-03-29 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop (in module xml-fop) failed

2006-03-29 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

Help for ressources to generate Rtf with Fop

2006-03-29 Thread BONNICHON Franck
Title: Message Hello, We are using an Fop 0.20.5. How can we do to generate Rtf instead of Pdf ? If it is possible, where could we find the good "fop.jar" to do that ? Thanks by advance Best regards F. BONNICHON (France)

Re: Help for ressources to generate Rtf with Fop

2006-03-29 Thread Christian Mayemba
BONNICHON Franck a écrit : Hello, We are using an Fop 0.20.5. How can we do to generate Rtf instead of Pdf ? If it is possible, where could we find the good fop.jar to do that ? Thanks by advance Best regards F. BONNICHON (France) Bonjour. Je me permet de vous répondre en Français car

Re: Help for ressources to generate Rtf with Fop

2006-03-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 29.03.2006 18:43:21 Christian Mayemba wrote: BONNICHON Franck a écrit : Hello, We are using an Fop 0.20.5. How can we do to generate Rtf instead of Pdf ? If it is possible, where could we find the good fop.jar to do that ? Thanks by advance Best regards F. BONNICHON

Re: svn commit: r389563 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation: content/xdocs/trunk/embedding.xml content/xdocs/trunk/intermediate.xml content/xdocs/trunk/output.xml content/xdocs/trunk/pdfencr

2006-03-29 Thread Simon Pepping
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'd be grateful if someone would review my changes here. I'd like to avoid having bugs in our example code again. Thanks! I had a quick look at the embedding page. It looks good and very extensive. I also see a few things that

Re: svn commit: r389563 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation: content/xdocs/trunk/embedding.xml content/xdocs/trunk/intermediate.xml content/xdocs/trunk/output.xml content/xdocs/trunk/pdfencr

2006-03-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
ASAP, of course. :-) I think we need to update the site. I'll look into it again tomorrow morning. Thanks, Simon! On 29.03.2006 21:56:41 Simon Pepping wrote: On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'd be grateful if someone would review my changes here. I'd like to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39138] - block border-left/right works only if margin-left/right=0 is set

2006-03-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39138. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: svn commit: r389563 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation: content/xdocs/trunk/embedding.xml content/xdocs/trunk/intermediate.xml content/xdocs/trunk/output.xml content/xdocs/trunk/pdfencr

2006-03-29 Thread Jeremias Maerki
What exactly needs correction in the overview? I've reread it and I don't see any problems there. I've republished the site now and I can easily do so again if there's anything else that should be changed. On 29.03.2006 21:56:41 Simon Pepping wrote: On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:15:13PM +0200,