https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
--- Comment #2 from Mehdi Houshmand 2011-10-20 06:56:49 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Will Version 1.3 be supported?
>
> "This allows PDF versions to be specified between 1.4-1.7."
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51385
Willi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||52060
--
Configure bugmail: https://issue
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Willi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||51385
--- Comment #1 from Willi 2011-10-2
UNSUBSCRIBE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060
Bug #: 52060
Summary: PDF/X-3:2002 should go with PDF Version 1.3
Product: Fop
Version: 1.1dev
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #43 from Dilip Shah 2011-10-20 03:55:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 27822
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27822
list of Gujarati words and sentences
As per my exchange with Glenn, I've attached a UTF-
It appears that test may be hiding the error.
I tried putting your main test logic into a test program I had already
created.
Now I tried creating a new class to put that directly into the main
method and I get this crash on test.
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.
Works fine for me. Getting no error message is hard to believe since the
whole program is in a try..catch(Throwable t). Nothing but a JVM crash
gets around that. All assuming, of course, that you didn't change the
example program.
My console output looks like this:
FOP ExampleJava2D2PDF
Preparin
I found the incorrect build path reference. Now it just doesn't finish.
It gets to that statement:
configurator.configure(g2d, cfg);
Then doesn't appear to be doing anything.
It keeps running back to the call:
configure(g2d, createAutoFontsConfiguration());
Then jumps right to the finally block, t
We -- at InterSystems -- deploy an application that runs in upwards of 40
countries, using many of the languages for which complex script support is
required.
We definitely need complex script support. It is a requirement for us.
Thanks,
Jonathan Levinson
Senior Software Developer
Object Group
Over the past ten years computing has pervaded life in all its facets,
and spread over the world. As a consequence computing is now used in
all languages and all scripts.
When I open my devanagari test file in emacs, it just works. When I
open it in firefox, it just works. The same when I open it
There must be something off. Last change to PDFGraphics2D was on
2011-10-15. And in current Trunk the NPE in getString (if any) would
have to happen on line 297, not 290. I'm pretty sure you've still go a
FOP 1.0 JAR in the classpath or something like that. Please check your
classpath.
On 19.10.20
===
Jozef Skrabo
Responsable Développement (IED)
j.skr...@dalloz.fr
tel : 01.40.64.53.12
Editions Dalloz
31-35, rue Froidevaux
75685 PARIS Cedex 14
===
De :Matthias Reinert
A : fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Date : 18/10/2011 13:07
Objet : UNSU
What am I missing?
I downloaded fop.jar from yesterday's snapshot and ran the example
program at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/examples/embedding/ja
va/embedding/ExampleJava2D2PDF.java?view=markup
It crashed.
Stack trace shows:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apac
6 +1 votes and Mockito has has been accepted.
Peter
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Pascal Sancho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 for me
>
> Le 17/10/2011 15:06, Clay Leeds a écrit :
>> I'll belly up to the bar and have a Mockito as well... ;-)
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2011, at 8
HI,
IMHO, "Production ready" should only cited before a FOP release, not for
a merge of branch to trunk.
At this stage, the only questions are about regression tests (and code
readability, since open source).
Merging the branch now should encourage more users to test these new
features and give f
Well, as a user I was using that class to create PDFs with embedded
code.
Sometimes that user developer line is a little fuzzy.
If it's been totally redesigned I apparently need to hunt down some
documentation.
-Original Message-
From: mehdi houshmand [mailto:med1...@gmail.com]
Sent: We
Sorry Eric, I meant to say, this is a developer question, could you
post questions concerning the code on fop-dev in future.
Thanks
Mehdi
On 19 October 2011 14:47, mehdi houshmand wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> The renderers of old were removed quite a while ago in commit#989178.
>
> Hope that helps
>
>
I provided a detailed comment on Vincent's brief review at:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687#c31
With the exception of the the following comment, the remaining comments are
editorial in nature or have no actionable response.
> How feasible is it to run the BIDI algorithm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52010
Peter Hancock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 18/10/2011 19:55, Simon Pepping wrote:
I merged the ComplexScripts branch into trunk. Result:
Hi Simon,
As well of the question of how to do the merge there is also the
question should we do the merge? Of course this is a valuable feature to
the community, and Glenn has invested a lot of
21 matches
Mail list logo