[Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Peter Hancock
Hi, Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox' extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners. Please refer to [1] and [2] for details. There is an example fo [3] that demonstrates the

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread mehdi houshmand
+1 On 12 October 2012 10:40, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox' extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners. Please refer to

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi, Very good job! +1 2012/10/12 Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com: Hi, Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox' extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners. Please refer to

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread The Web Maestro
Sounds good! +1 from me! Kind regards, Web Maestro Clay -- the.webmaes...@gmail.com - http://ourlil.com/ My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Luis Benardo and

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Glenn Adams
I haven't had a chance to look at the details, but does this extension follow the (property name and value) definitions found in CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders [4]? If it doesn't, then my vote is -1; otherwise, I would vote +1. However, I also notice that the fox property name proposed in [1]

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Peter Hancock
Thanks for taking the time to review this! On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote: ... However, I also notice that the fox property name proposed in [1] contains uppercase (fox:border-BLOCK-radius-INLINE). That is a definite no-no, and thus warrants a -1 vote until

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Clay Leeds
I would prefer CSS3 naming conventions as well. Clay My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Oct 12, 2012, at 6:48 AM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for taking the time to review this! On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Glenn

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Pascal Sancho
Yes, CSS3 naming is easier to understand. And like other border-* properties, top, right, bottom, left should be mapped to equivalent FO directions in lr-tb mode (respectively before, end, after, start). 2012/10/12 Clay Leeds the.webmaes...@gmail.com: I would prefer CSS3 naming conventions as

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread The Web Maestro
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com wrote: Yes, CSS3 naming is easier to understand. And like other border-* properties, top, right, bottom, left should be mapped to equivalent FO directions in lr-tb mode (respectively before, end, after, start). Yes... We've

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Christopher R. Maden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/12/2012 10:34 AM, The Web Maestro wrote: Yes... We've got two 'standards' to follow here: XSL-FO and CSS3. Where possible, I'd like to err on the side of CSS3, since that is so much more widely used. In fact, where (if?) there are

Re: [Vote] for the merge of Temp_RoundedCorners

2012-10-12 Thread Glenn Adams
My preference would be to provide both the CSS3 named properties and also writing system relative properties, giving the user the preference of which to use. But I would suggest using the same pattern as CSS3 for property names for these latter: border-top-left-radius border-top-right-radius