Hi,
Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch
Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox'
extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners.
Please refer to [1] and [2] for details.
There is an example fo [3] that demonstrates the
+1
On 12 October 2012 10:40, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch
Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox'
extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners.
Please refer to
Hi,
Very good job!
+1
2012/10/12 Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Luis Benardo and Myself have just done some clean up to the branch
Temp_RoundedCorners. This branch implements support for 'fox'
extension properties for specifying borders with rounded corners.
Please refer to
Sounds good!
+1 from me!
Kind regards,
Web Maestro Clay
--
the.webmaes...@gmail.com - http://ourlil.com/
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Luis Benardo and
I haven't had a chance to look at the details, but does this extension
follow the (property name and value) definitions found in CSS3 Backgrounds
and Borders [4]? If it doesn't, then my vote is -1; otherwise, I would vote
+1.
However, I also notice that the fox property name proposed in [1]
Thanks for taking the time to review this!
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
...
However, I also notice that the fox property name proposed in [1] contains
uppercase (fox:border-BLOCK-radius-INLINE). That is a definite no-no, and
thus warrants a -1 vote until
I would prefer CSS3 naming conventions as well.
Clay
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet
On Oct 12, 2012, at 6:48 AM, Peter Hancock peter.hanc...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to review this!
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Glenn
Yes, CSS3 naming is easier to understand.
And like other border-* properties, top, right, bottom, left should be
mapped to equivalent FO directions in lr-tb mode (respectively before,
end, after, start).
2012/10/12 Clay Leeds the.webmaes...@gmail.com:
I would prefer CSS3 naming conventions as
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, CSS3 naming is easier to understand.
And like other border-* properties, top, right, bottom, left should be
mapped to equivalent FO directions in lr-tb mode (respectively before,
end, after, start).
Yes... We've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2012 10:34 AM, The Web Maestro wrote:
Yes... We've got two 'standards' to follow here: XSL-FO and CSS3.
Where possible, I'd like to err on the side of CSS3, since that is
so much more widely used. In fact, where (if?) there are
My preference would be to provide both the CSS3 named properties and also
writing system relative properties, giving the user the preference of which
to use. But I would suggest using the same pattern as CSS3 for property
names for these latter:
border-top-left-radius
border-top-right-radius
11 matches
Mail list logo