DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6437] - Tables without fo:table-column don't render
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6437. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6437 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 09:20 --- This is an importand bug because a lot people want generate pdf from html or xhtml files. If you have a lot html or xhtml files and want to convert them for example with css2fop.jar you get problems with every table. because people normaly don't define a table with colgroup/col tags -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34058] New: - text-indent is applied to all FOText areas instead of just the first one.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34058. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34058 Summary: text-indent is applied to all FOText areas instead of just the first one. Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The spec for text-indent says: This property specifies the indentation of the first line of text in a block. More precisely, it specifies the indentation of the first box that flows into the block's first line box. The box is indented with respect to the left (or right, for right-to-left layout) edge of the line box. User agents should render this indentation as blank space. But the 0.20.5 version of the renderer is applying text-indent to all FOText areas within that block instead of just the first one. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34058] - text-indent is applied to all FOText areas instead of just the first one.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34058. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34058 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 16:11 --- Created an attachment (id=14507) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14507action=view) apply text-indent only if isFirst() is true. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34058] - text-indent is applied to all FOText areas instead of just the first one.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34058. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34058 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-17 16:13 --- Created an attachment (id=14508) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14508action=view) When looping through the childern, set isFirst() to true only for the first child -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] - [Patch] current AWTRenderer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-19 02:08 --- Created an attachment (id=14520) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14520action=view) Unified diff against HEAD. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20407] - [PATCH] Configure image caching using the configuration file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20407. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20407 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 18:32 --- See bug #34308 for a similar solution (it also improves image caching). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34316] - [Patch] for website, reflecting the status of FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34316. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34316 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 21:56 --- Created an attachment (id=14626) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14626action=view) Unified diff against HEAD. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34316] - [Patch] for website, reflecting the status of FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34316. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34316 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-06 09:10 --- Applied with little modifications. Thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34354] - Not suported menu
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34354. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Not suported menu |Not suported menu --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-07 20:18 --- Dynamic contextmenu Creation manipulated by JAVASCRIPT to creat diffrent menu , supported by adobe SVGViewer. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34355] New: - BufferOverflowException when running SVG2PDF on huge SVG file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34355. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34355 Summary: BufferOverflowException when running SVG2PDF on huge SVG file Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: svg AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Getting java.nio.BufferOverflowException whene running ExampleSVG2PDF -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34355] - BufferOverflowException when running SVG2PDF on huge SVG file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34355. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34355 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-07 20:32 --- Created an attachment (id=14645) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14645action=view) Code -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1180] - Problem with monospaced font
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1180. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1180 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-09 18:56 --- Let's celebrate the 4th anniversary of this bug in style. To cite a famous physicist (C.Pauli, I believe): This is not right, it is not even wrong. Well, I just removed (locally) the fudge factor for 'whitespace' and it works fine. What the original thinking behind the original kludge was beats me. Do you want to have half a chance of seeing the same output on different output devices? Remove the kludge! Do you want to be able to predict the size of some text based on font metrics without going through FOP to find out? Remove the kludge! You don't _like_ _some_ spacing of a given Font? Where exactly does that bother you? Only in AWT? In Word? In PDF? Well, I've got news for you: Find yourself a font you like better! Whoever commited that code should be relieved of his privileges. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34387] New: - FOP xml transformation Exception
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34387. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34387 Summary: FOP xml transformation Exception Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P4 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn: 9090 OtherBugsDependingO 9888 nThis: I had a problem while generating pdf's when using fop ommand line option. It says number format 0 (xmlTransformation exception) I implies this FOP -conf\userconfig - xsl xslfile - xml xml file -pdf pdffile Thanks for your in advance Bye Senthil -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34469] New: - Left-right tables don't stop at the paper border
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469 Summary: Left-right tables don't stop at the paper border Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Left-right tables don't stop at the paper border. They should be continued in the next line with a new header. Top-down tables stop at the paper border, and continue with a new header on the next page. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34469] - Left-right tables don't stop at the paper border
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-15 13:38 --- Created an attachment (id=14729) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14729action=view) generated PDF -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34469] - Left-right tables don't stop at the paper border
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-15 13:38 --- Created an attachment (id=14730) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14730action=view) data file -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34469] - Left-right tables don't stop at the paper border
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34469 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-15 13:39 --- Created an attachment (id=14731) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14731action=view) stylesheet -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34354] - Not suported menu
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34354. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34354 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-24 07:34 --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) How this(Menu)can be implemented in PDF in the first place My answer is that I don't need implementation of it , I want only that Batik ignore it - it's not an error to use it. It is an error to use it. You can not add arbitrary elements to the SVG namespace. If the menu element were in another namespace (say Adobe something) Batik would ignore it and processes the elements in the SVG namespace but you can not place arbitrary elements in the SVG namespace, it is a violation of the SVG specification. The use of menu in Adobe can be explained in the following web site(there are examples to test) : http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/07/03/adobesvg.html -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34354] - Not suported menu
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34354. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34354 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-24 14:32 --- Reading this makes it clear that it is your use of the feature that is the problem. You (or someone) has choosen to store 'proxies' of the menu content in the SVG file in the SVG namespace. At some point these elements are copied/imported into the contextMenu's document. There is no problem with the Adobe context menu document having these elements the problem is that this document has added these elements to an SVG document in the SVG namespace. I suspect that all you really need to do is add a default namespace decl to the menu item to move them out of the the SVG namespace into a suitable 'extension' namespace. The method that constructs the menu in the contextMenu document might need some adjustment but probably not. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34948] - related to bug 13347
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34948 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-18 11:26 --- Dont raise bugs in order to ask questions. The correct procedure is to ask questions on the user mailing list. See the website on how to register with the user list: http://xml.apache.org/fop/maillist.html#fop-user Ok, now to your question: the warning table-layout=auto occurs because the table-layout has a default value of auto, but FOP doesnt yet support auto. Specify explicitly table- layout=fixed on your tables to avoid seeing this message. The error message is simply saying that you must specify a width on the table element. Chris -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23709] - Height of SVG rect tag negative when rendering SVG
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23709.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23709
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-01 17:10 ---
I have the same problem with placing backgrounds on cells.
In the org.apache.fop.render.AbstractRenderer:123 There is a negative h.
if (props.backColor.alpha() == 0) {
this.addFilledRect(x, y, w, -h, props.backColor);
}
I just for svg out put I placed a Math.abs(h) in
org.apache.fop.render.svg.SVGRenderer:195.
protected void addRect(int x, int y, int w, int h, float r, float g,
float b, float fr, float fg, float fb) {
Element rect = SVGUtilities.createRect(svgDocument, x / 1000f,
pageHeight - (y / 1000f), w / 1000f, Math.abs(h) / 1000f);
rect.setAttributeNS(null, style, stroke:rgb( + ((int)(255 * r))
+ , + ((int)(255 * g)) + , + ((int)(255 * b)) + );fill:rgb( + ((int)(255
* fr)) + , + ((int)(255 * fg)) + , + ((int)(255 * fb)) + ));
currentPageG.appendChild(rect);
}
I have not investagated what imapact changing the -h in the abstract renderer
would have on other implemenations of addRect.
John Fleenor
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] - [Patch] current AWTRenderer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14426|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #14520|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-08 23:13 --- Created an attachment (id=15340) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15340action=view) Unified diff against HEAD please see my mail to the list for more details -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33760] - [Patch] current AWTRenderer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33760 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 10:52 --- Patch applied. This stuff looks very good now. Thank you very much for your effort and the quick response, Renaud! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35358] New: - [PATCH] Fop Viewer improvements
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35358. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35358 Summary: [PATCH] Fop Viewer improvements Product: Fop Version: all Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: awt renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See discussion on fop-dev for details Done: Separated out the preview panels and control logic from the buttons and dialog to make it easier to use elsewhere. Added a continuous scrolling mode similar to that used by acrobat reader. Also added continuous facing mode. Added fit-width and fit-to-page zoom options. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16929] - Table rows of a table in a page body with two columns are ommitted on last page.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16929. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16929 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22627] - [PATCH] ReadMe file for FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22627. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22627 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #7913 is|0 |1 obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-22 21:31 --- Created an attachment (id=15519) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15519action=view) Header file for mirror's download page -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35478] - Attribute number-columns-spanned leads to the endless loop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35478. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35478 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-23 08:28 --- ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master master-name=simple masterpage page- height=11in page-width=8.5in margin-left=1.25in margin-top=1in margin- bottom=1in margin-right=1.25in fo:region-body margin-top=1cm margin-bottom=1cm margin-left=0cm margin-right=0cm overflow=hidden/ fo:region-before region-name=xsl-region-before- simple masterpage extent=1cm overflow=hidden/ fo:region-after region-name=xsl-region-after-simple masterpage extent=1cm overflow=hidden/ /fo:simple-page-master /fo:layout-master-set fo:page-sequence master-reference=simple masterpage fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-before-simple masterpage fo:block font-family=serif font-size=12pt font- style=normal font-variant=normal font-weight=normal color=#00 text- align=left text-indent=0em text-transform=none letter-spacing=normal line-height=normal word-spacing=normal white-space=normal orphans=2 widows=2 keep-together=auto fo:block fo:block width=100% fo:table table-omit-header-at- break=true table-layout=fixed fo:table-column/ fo:table-body fo:table-row fo:table-cell font-size=23pt font-weight=bold text-align=center fo:block fo:block fo:inline Title /fo:inline /fo:block /fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row /fo:table-body /fo:table /fo:block /fo:block /fo:block /fo:static-content fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-after-simple masterpage fo:block font-family=serif font-size=12pt font- style=normal font-variant=normal font-weight=normal color=#00 text- align=left text-indent=0em text-transform=none letter-spacing=normal line-height=normal word-spacing=normal white-space=normal orphans=2 widows=2 keep-together=auto fo:block fo:block width=100% fo:table table-omit-header-at- break=true table-layout=fixed fo:table-column/ fo:table-column/ fo:table-body fo:table-row fo:table-cell fo:block fo:block fo:inline 6/23/05 2:15 PM /fo:inline /fo:block
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22627] - Update mirror/download page HEADER README (was [PATCH] ReadMe file for FOP)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22627. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22627 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[PATCH] ReadMe file for FOP |Update mirror/download page ||HEADER README (was [PATCH] ||ReadMe file for FOP) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-23 16:46 --- We should add this to the FOP Doc Management Page: http://xml.apache.org/fop/dev/doc.html To implement this change, just copy the files to /www/www.apache.org/dist/xml/fop/ (we should probably put them under SVN somewhere). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35534] New: - fo document output is placed in page margins
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534 Summary: fo document output is placed in page margins Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See attachment fo.fo - the input trunk.pdf - the output generated with svn trunk code maint.pdf - the output generated with 0.20.5 (how it should look like) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35534] - fo document output is placed in page margins
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 02:37 --- Created an attachment (id=15550) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15550action=view) input -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35534] - fo document output is placed in page margins
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|pdf renderer|page-master/layout OS/Version|Windows XP |All --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 09:12 --- Initial analysis: there seems to be a descrepancy between the reported element list and what the addAreas() stage is writing out to the page. I suspect that space-before is not handled properly in list-items. I'll investigate further. BTW, Nils' example shows again that we have another point to attend to: Our current nominal text box is much bigger than it was for 0.20.5. I've seen this before and I think we're approaching the time when this needs to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35534] - fo document output is placed in page margins
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 09:41 --- It is as I suspected. ListItemLM currently doesn't generate the glues for space-before and space-after. I've written a test case: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengine/testca ses/list4.xml I'll try to look at this shortly. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35577] New: - while running, system reports: The id header already exists in this document
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35577. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35577 Summary: while running, system reports: The id header already exists in this document Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In FO, there is a property id defined on the row which is table header.If the page fis into a page, then all are OK. But if the content of the table is more than one page, then system throws exception: org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: null:32:34 The id header already exists in this document at org.apache.fop.datatypes.IDReferences.createID (IDReferences.java:119) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableRow.layout(TableRow.java:277) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.AbstractTableBody.layout (AbstractTableBody.java:236) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.Table.layout(Table.java:282) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.Block.layout(Block.java:257) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.Block.layout(Block.java:257) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.AbstractFlow.layout(AbstractFlow.java:154) at org.apache.fop.fo.flow.AbstractFlow.layout(AbstractFlow.java:110) at org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.PageSequence.makePage (PageSequence.java:400) at org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.PageSequence.format (PageSequence.java:338) at org.apache.fop.apps.StreamRenderer.render(StreamRenderer.java:262) at org.apache.fop.fo.FOTreeBuilder.endElement(FOTreeBuilder.java:223) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.endElement(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLNSDocumentScannerImpl.scanEndElement (Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDispatcher .dispatch(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl.scanDocument (Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DTDConfiguration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DTDConfiguration.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.parse(Unknown Source) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.render(Driver.java:498) at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.run(Driver.java:565) at embedding.ExampleFO2PDF.convertFO2PDF(ExampleFO2PDF.java:101) at embedding.ExampleFO2PDF.main(ExampleFO2PDF.java:136) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34308] - [PATCH] memory and file descriptor leaks when using images
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34308. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34308 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14622|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #14629|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 16:23 --- Created an attachment (id=15661) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15661action=view) Improved patch for an LRU cache which cleans up Now complete patch, with ImageCacheEntry and everything. It has also been reworked to use a LinkedHashMap for storing the cache entries. Further, a setCacheMap method has been added (this will be used within http://www.open-eis.com/ to supply an implementation which integrates into the caching framework of open-EIS). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35736] New: - Problem while converting svg with text to ps
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35736. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35736 Summary: Problem while converting svg with text to ps Product: Fop Version: 0.20.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: svg AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have created a svg which contains some text. converted the same using fop -xml xmlfile -xsl xslfile -ps outpsfile. The resultant Ps file has junk text, which came from svg but other text form fo is proper. With the work around it was resolved. created a fo file using xalan -IN xmlfile -XSL xslfile -OUT output.fo generated ps using fop output.fo output.ps This time the text came from svg is accurate. If required I can send the image files. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35736] - Problem while converting svg with text to ps
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35736. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35736 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 14:59 --- Created an attachment (id=15672) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15672action=view) junk output ps -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35736] - Problem while converting svg with text to ps
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35736. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-14 15:31 --- Please have a look at the following link: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-userm=111053717910098w=2 This should help you get rid of the problem. That particular problem is already fixed in the development code (SVN Trunk). You could also try the trunk code, or even better: If you only want to convert SVG to PS and not XSL- FO, you can use Apache Batik directly without having to convert the SVG graphic into an XSL-FO file. Batik 1.6 doesn't have the problem you describe. Unfortunately, the PostScript output is currently not available from the command-line, only through Java code. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35749] - fo wrapper/basic-link combination doesn't work
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 05:15 --- Created an attachment (id=15676) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15676action=view) fo input -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35749] - fo wrapper/basic-link combination doesn't work
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 05:16 --- Created an attachment (id=15677) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15677action=view) good maintenance branch output -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35749] - fo wrapper/basic-link combination doesn't work
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 05:16 --- Created an attachment (id=15678) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15678action=view) failing trunk output -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35749] - fo wrapper/basic-link combination doesn't work
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|fop-dev@xml.apache.org |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Component|pdf renderer|page-master/layout OS/Version|other |All Platform|Other |All --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-15 19:59 --- Fixed in SVN: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=219226view=rev (I hope I fixed it in a good way. I'm not sure it's the best way.) Incidentally, your bug report coincides with my next bigger task: checking if all the ID stuff is handled properly. I still have to write a test case for that bug I'm currently unsure how to do it, especially since wrapper doesn't create any areas. Otherwise, I could simply add the IDs to the area tree and test them there. I'll figure something out. :-) Nils, thanks for reporting the issue. Stuff like this is highly appreciated! I'm keeping the bug report open for the moment as a reminder for myself that I have yet to write an automated test case for this problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Bug report for Fop [2005/07/18]
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) |
| | +-+
| | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement |
| | | +-+
| | | | Date Posted |
| | | | +--+
| | | | | Description |
| | | | | |
| 635|Opn|Nor|2001-02-18|Doesn't support id= attribute in fo:page-sequence |
| 953|Opn|Nor|2001-03-12|Incorrect hyperlinks area rendering in justified t|
| 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files|
| 1180|New|Maj|2001-04-02|Problem with monospaced font |
| 1859|Opn|Min|2001-05-22|org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.reset() doesn't fully r|
| 1998|New|Nor|2001-06-05|linefeed-treatment not understood |
| 2150|Ass|Maj|2001-06-13|New page with a table-header but without any tabl|
| 2475|Ass|Nor|2001-07-06|Borders don't appear to work in fo:table-row|
| 2740|New|Maj|2001-07-23|multi-page tables sometimes render badly |
| 2909|New|Maj|2001-07-30|Gradient render error |
| 2964|Ass|Nor|2001-08-02|problems with height of cells in tables |
| 2988|New|Maj|2001-08-03|0.19: list-item-label does not stick to list-item-|
| 3044|Ass|Maj|2001-08-08|keep-together not functioning |
| 3280|New|Nor|2001-08-27|PCL Renderer doesn't work |
| 3305|Opn|Nor|2001-08-28|list-block overlapping footnote body |
| 3497|New|Cri|2001-09-07|id already exists error when using span=all attr|
| 3824|New|Blk|2001-09-25|MIF option with tables|
| 4030|New|Nor|2001-10-08|IOException creating Postscript with graphics on S|
| 4126|New|Nor|2001-10-12|FontState.width() returns pts instead of millipts |
| 4226|New|Nor|2001-10-17|The orphans property doesn't seem to work |
| 4388|New|Nor|2001-10-24|Nullpointer exception in the construction of new D|
| 4415|New|Nor|2001-10-25|scaling=uniform does not work on images... |
| 4510|New|Nor|2001-10-30|fo:inline common properties ignored? |
| 4535|New|Maj|2001-10-31|PCL renderer 1.13 not rendering SVG |
| 4767|New|Nor|2001-11-09|SVG text is distored in PDF output|
| 5001|New|Nor|2001-11-21|content-width and content-height ignored? |
| 5010|New|Enh|2001-11-21|Better error reporting needed |
| 5124|New|Maj|2001-11-27|fo:block-container is not rendered properly using |
| 5335|Opn|Min|2001-12-10|Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from |
| 5655|Ass|Nor|2002-01-02|text-decoration cannot take multiple values |
| 6094|Opn|Maj|2002-01-29|0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop|
| 6237|Opn|Nor|2002-02-05|#xFB01 (fi ligature) produces a sharp? |
| 6305|New|Nor|2002-02-07|Using fo:table-and-caption results in empty output|
| 6427|New|Enh|2002-02-13|Adding additional Type 1 fonts problem|
| 6437|New|Maj|2002-02-13|Tables without fo:table-column don't render |
| 6483|New|Nor|2002-02-15|Table, Loop, footer could not fit on page, moving|
| 6844|New|Nor|2002-03-04|No line breaks inserted in list-item-label|
| 6918|New|Enh|2002-03-06|reference-orientation has no effect |
| 6997|New|Nor|2002-03-09|[PATCH] Row-spanned row data breaks over a page wi|
| 7140|New|Enh|2002-03-15|page-position attribute set to last on condition|
| 7241|New|Nor|2002-03-19|keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on|
| 7283|New|Nor|2002-03-20|Table border misaligned when using margin-left in |
| 7337|New|Nor|2002-03-21|border around external image leaves empty space |
| 7487|New|Nor|2002-03-26|break-before=page for table inserts empty page |
| 7496|New|Nor|2002-03-26|The table header borders are not adjusted to the b|
| 7525|New|Cri|2002-03-27|table with spans inside a list-block |
| 7919|New|Cri|2002-04-10|problem to use attribute linefeed-treatment and li|
| 8003|Ass|Maj|2002-04-12|FopImageFactory never releases cached images |
| 8050|New|Nor|2002-04-13|Soft hyphen (shy;) is not handled properly |
| 8321|New|Nor|2002-04-19|from-parent('width') returns 0 for nested tables |
| 8463|New|Nor|2002-04-24|SVG clipping in external.fo example doc when rende|
| 8767|Ass|Min|2002
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35787] New: - Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787 Summary: Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block- progression-dimension' Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See attached - a fairly simple .fo that i hand off to last nights code in trunk. I'm seeing the following error on STDERR about a dozen times which does not show up with the maintenance branch: 18.07.2005 22:46:55 org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.table.TableContentLayoutManager createElementsForRowGroup Contents of row 0 violate a maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension. Due to its contents the row grows to 14250 millipoints. The row constraint resolve to MinOptMax: min=14000; opt=14000; max=14000 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35787] - Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-19 04:50 --- Created an attachment (id=15700) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15700action=view) Input FO that is being send to FOP -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35787] - Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-19 04:51 --- Created an attachment (id=15701) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15701action=view) 1.0dev output after getting warnings on STDERR -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35787] - Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-19 04:51 --- Created an attachment (id=15702) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15702action=view) output with maint branch (looks slightly different) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35787] - Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-19 15:03 --- Another good one, Nils, although it took me a little to find out what was wrong. Here we go: The FO file creates tables with collapsing border model (which is the default, but not fully implemented, yet. See warnings). Now the code that produces the warning message you describe doesn't take into account that the height property only applies to the table cell's content. The border widths must not be taken into calculation whether the content is taller than allowed. But that's exactly what happens right now. So, yet another things to look at for me. Thanks, Nils! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35787] - Getting warning about 'maximum constraint in block-progression-dimension'
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35787 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|pdf renderer|page-master/layout Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-19 16:07 --- I think the problem should be fixed now. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=219685view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35797] - [PATCH] FOP renders SVG images in different places than other image types
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35797. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35797 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FOP renders SVG images in |[PATCH] FOP renders SVG |different places than other |images in different places |image types |than other image types --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-20 13:25 --- Thanks for the Patch. It may fix your problem but it looks to me like you have broken a few other things, e.g. how will messages reported by Batik bubble up to the FOP user? Your patch just sets a Null Logger! In any case, it is academic since development to the maintainance branch has been frozen and so no patches will be applied to it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Bug report for Fop [2005/07/24]
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) |
| | +-+
| | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement |
| | | +-+
| | | | Date Posted |
| | | | +--+
| | | | | Description |
| | | | | |
| 635|Opn|Nor|2001-02-18|Doesn't support id= attribute in fo:page-sequence |
| 953|Opn|Nor|2001-03-12|Incorrect hyperlinks area rendering in justified t|
| 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files|
| 1180|New|Maj|2001-04-02|Problem with monospaced font |
| 1859|Opn|Min|2001-05-22|org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.reset() doesn't fully r|
| 1998|New|Nor|2001-06-05|linefeed-treatment not understood |
| 2150|Ass|Maj|2001-06-13|New page with a table-header but without any tabl|
| 2475|Ass|Nor|2001-07-06|Borders don't appear to work in fo:table-row|
| 2740|New|Maj|2001-07-23|multi-page tables sometimes render badly |
| 2909|New|Maj|2001-07-30|Gradient render error |
| 2964|Ass|Nor|2001-08-02|problems with height of cells in tables |
| 2988|New|Maj|2001-08-03|0.19: list-item-label does not stick to list-item-|
| 3044|Ass|Maj|2001-08-08|keep-together not functioning |
| 3280|New|Nor|2001-08-27|PCL Renderer doesn't work |
| 3305|Opn|Nor|2001-08-28|list-block overlapping footnote body |
| 3497|New|Cri|2001-09-07|id already exists error when using span=all attr|
| 3824|New|Blk|2001-09-25|MIF option with tables|
| 4030|New|Nor|2001-10-08|IOException creating Postscript with graphics on S|
| 4126|New|Nor|2001-10-12|FontState.width() returns pts instead of millipts |
| 4226|New|Nor|2001-10-17|The orphans property doesn't seem to work |
| 4388|New|Nor|2001-10-24|Nullpointer exception in the construction of new D|
| 4415|New|Nor|2001-10-25|scaling=uniform does not work on images... |
| 4510|New|Nor|2001-10-30|fo:inline common properties ignored? |
| 4535|New|Maj|2001-10-31|PCL renderer 1.13 not rendering SVG |
| 4767|New|Nor|2001-11-09|SVG text is distored in PDF output|
| 5001|New|Nor|2001-11-21|content-width and content-height ignored? |
| 5010|New|Enh|2001-11-21|Better error reporting needed |
| 5124|New|Maj|2001-11-27|fo:block-container is not rendered properly using |
| 5335|Opn|Min|2001-12-10|Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from |
| 5655|Ass|Nor|2002-01-02|text-decoration cannot take multiple values |
| 6094|Opn|Maj|2002-01-29|0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop|
| 6237|Opn|Nor|2002-02-05|#xFB01 (fi ligature) produces a sharp? |
| 6305|New|Nor|2002-02-07|Using fo:table-and-caption results in empty output|
| 6427|New|Enh|2002-02-13|Adding additional Type 1 fonts problem|
| 6437|New|Maj|2002-02-13|Tables without fo:table-column don't render |
| 6483|New|Nor|2002-02-15|Table, Loop, footer could not fit on page, moving|
| 6844|New|Nor|2002-03-04|No line breaks inserted in list-item-label|
| 6918|New|Enh|2002-03-06|reference-orientation has no effect |
| 6997|New|Nor|2002-03-09|[PATCH] Row-spanned row data breaks over a page wi|
| 7140|New|Enh|2002-03-15|page-position attribute set to last on condition|
| 7241|New|Nor|2002-03-19|keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on|
| 7283|New|Nor|2002-03-20|Table border misaligned when using margin-left in |
| 7337|New|Nor|2002-03-21|border around external image leaves empty space |
| 7487|New|Nor|2002-03-26|break-before=page for table inserts empty page |
| 7496|New|Nor|2002-03-26|The table header borders are not adjusted to the b|
| 7525|New|Cri|2002-03-27|table with spans inside a list-block |
| 7919|New|Cri|2002-04-10|problem to use attribute linefeed-treatment and li|
| 8003|Ass|Maj|2002-04-12|FopImageFactory never releases cached images |
| 8050|New|Nor|2002-04-13|Soft hyphen (shy;) is not handled properly |
| 8321|New|Nor|2002-04-19|from-parent('width') returns 0 for nested tables |
| 8463|New|Nor|2002-04-24|SVG clipping in external.fo example doc when rende|
| 8767|Ass|Min|2002
Bug report for Fop [2005/07/25]
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) |
| | +-+
| | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement |
| | | +-+
| | | | Date Posted |
| | | | +--+
| | | | | Description |
| | | | | |
| 635|Opn|Nor|2001-02-18|Doesn't support id= attribute in fo:page-sequence |
| 953|Opn|Nor|2001-03-12|Incorrect hyperlinks area rendering in justified t|
| 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files|
| 1180|New|Maj|2001-04-02|Problem with monospaced font |
| 1859|Opn|Min|2001-05-22|org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.reset() doesn't fully r|
| 1998|New|Nor|2001-06-05|linefeed-treatment not understood |
| 2150|Ass|Maj|2001-06-13|New page with a table-header but without any tabl|
| 2475|Ass|Nor|2001-07-06|Borders don't appear to work in fo:table-row|
| 2740|New|Maj|2001-07-23|multi-page tables sometimes render badly |
| 2909|New|Maj|2001-07-30|Gradient render error |
| 2964|Ass|Nor|2001-08-02|problems with height of cells in tables |
| 2988|New|Maj|2001-08-03|0.19: list-item-label does not stick to list-item-|
| 3044|Ass|Maj|2001-08-08|keep-together not functioning |
| 3280|New|Nor|2001-08-27|PCL Renderer doesn't work |
| 3305|Opn|Nor|2001-08-28|list-block overlapping footnote body |
| 3497|New|Cri|2001-09-07|id already exists error when using span=all attr|
| 3824|New|Blk|2001-09-25|MIF option with tables|
| 4030|New|Nor|2001-10-08|IOException creating Postscript with graphics on S|
| 4126|New|Nor|2001-10-12|FontState.width() returns pts instead of millipts |
| 4226|New|Nor|2001-10-17|The orphans property doesn't seem to work |
| 4388|New|Nor|2001-10-24|Nullpointer exception in the construction of new D|
| 4415|New|Nor|2001-10-25|scaling=uniform does not work on images... |
| 4510|New|Nor|2001-10-30|fo:inline common properties ignored? |
| 4535|New|Maj|2001-10-31|PCL renderer 1.13 not rendering SVG |
| 4767|New|Nor|2001-11-09|SVG text is distored in PDF output|
| 5001|New|Nor|2001-11-21|content-width and content-height ignored? |
| 5010|New|Enh|2001-11-21|Better error reporting needed |
| 5124|New|Maj|2001-11-27|fo:block-container is not rendered properly using |
| 5335|Opn|Min|2001-12-10|Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from |
| 5655|Ass|Nor|2002-01-02|text-decoration cannot take multiple values |
| 6094|Opn|Maj|2002-01-29|0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop|
| 6237|Opn|Nor|2002-02-05|#xFB01 (fi ligature) produces a sharp? |
| 6305|New|Nor|2002-02-07|Using fo:table-and-caption results in empty output|
| 6427|New|Enh|2002-02-13|Adding additional Type 1 fonts problem|
| 6437|New|Maj|2002-02-13|Tables without fo:table-column don't render |
| 6483|New|Nor|2002-02-15|Table, Loop, footer could not fit on page, moving|
| 6844|New|Nor|2002-03-04|No line breaks inserted in list-item-label|
| 6918|New|Enh|2002-03-06|reference-orientation has no effect |
| 6997|New|Nor|2002-03-09|[PATCH] Row-spanned row data breaks over a page wi|
| 7140|New|Enh|2002-03-15|page-position attribute set to last on condition|
| 7241|New|Nor|2002-03-19|keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on|
| 7283|New|Nor|2002-03-20|Table border misaligned when using margin-left in |
| 7337|New|Nor|2002-03-21|border around external image leaves empty space |
| 7487|New|Nor|2002-03-26|break-before=page for table inserts empty page |
| 7496|New|Nor|2002-03-26|The table header borders are not adjusted to the b|
| 7525|New|Cri|2002-03-27|table with spans inside a list-block |
| 7919|New|Cri|2002-04-10|problem to use attribute linefeed-treatment and li|
| 8003|Ass|Maj|2002-04-12|FopImageFactory never releases cached images |
| 8050|New|Nor|2002-04-13|Soft hyphen (shy;) is not handled properly |
| 8321|New|Nor|2002-04-19|from-parent('width') returns 0 for nested tables |
| 8463|New|Nor|2002-04-24|SVG clipping in external.fo example doc when rende|
| 8767|Ass|Min|2002
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35534] - fo document output is placed in page margins
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35534 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-26 09:55 --- The situation is now improved here. The missing glues are now produced but if there are shrink and stretch possibilities the spaces are currently not adjusted, i.e. differing .minimum/.optimum/.maximum values on space-before and space-after may produce undesirable results. Changes: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=225133view=rev http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=225135view=rev http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=225147view=rev http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=225249view=rev http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=225250view=rev -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] New: - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918 Summary: [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Due to insufficient precision of the transformation matrix, shapes are not correctly positioned on larger graphics. As lines are rendered differently this results in ugly, unusable PDF output. The resolution is simple to provide a better precision in the PDF output (see attached patch). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-28 17:51 --- Created an attachment (id=15816) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15816action=view) patch to write transformation matrix with higher precision -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 11:33 --- Thanks for the patch. Do you have an example that shows the effect of your change that you could attach to this issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] New: - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937 Summary: [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0 Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch to add the getResults() functionality to the apps.Fop object to mirror the similar functionality in the 0.20.5 apps.Driver object. See also this thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=112244484519341w=2 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 14:39 --- Created an attachment (id=15822) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15822action=view) Diff of changes made -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 14:41 --- Created an attachment (id=15823) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15823action=view) FormattingResults.java - new class file -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35937] - [PATCH] Support for FormattingResults ported from 0.20.5 to 1.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35937 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 14:41 --- Created an attachment (id=15824) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15824action=view) PageSequenceResults.java - New class file -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35939] New: - [PATCH] Port of 0.20.5 Driver.java class
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35939. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35939 Summary: [PATCH] Port of 0.20.5 Driver.java class Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To be able to simply replace a 0.20.5 fop.jar with 1.0dev fop.jar I have written a backwards compatible apps.Driver.java class. Everything in the class has been labelled as deprecated. Even if you don't want to put it into the trunk its here in BugZilla so people who like me just want to quickly temporarily replace their 0.20.5 fop jar with 1.0dev without having to recode their application can grab it. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] New: - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940 Summary: 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5 Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: pdf renderer AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Had a first go at using 1.0dev as replacement for 0.20.5 and noticed a few problems with my sample: 1. Everything seems to be rendered in Times Roman font although the specified font selection is Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif 2. A line is broken when it doesn't needed to, i.e. the text Victorian Land Index Property Address Search Result is broken into two lines although there is plenty of space to have it on one line 3. There is extra space between table rows, i.e. between the text mentioned above and the date/time line is an empty line in the pdf when it shouldn't be. I'll attached sample fo and pdfs. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 17:45 --- Created an attachment (id=15826) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15826action=view) The sample FO file -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 17:46 --- Created an attachment (id=15828) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15828action=view) The PDF as generated with 0.20.5 -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 18:26 --- Initial analysis: (In reply to comment #0) Had a first go at using 1.0dev as replacement for 0.20.5 and noticed a few problems with my sample: 1. Everything seems to be rendered in Times Roman font although the specified font selection is Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif As 0.20.5, the trunk code doesn't support the comma-separated font lists, yet. It doesn't even see the Helvetica or sans-serif entries. It falls back to the default which seems to have been changed to serif. 2. A line is broken when it doesn't needed to, i.e. the text Victorian Land Index Property Address Search Result is broken into two lines although there is plenty of space to have it on one line Interesting. Only seems to happen for text-align=center. It doesn't happen with start or justify. Need to investigate that more closely. 3. There is extra space between table rows, i.e. between the text mentioned above and the date/time line is an empty line in the pdf when it shouldn't be. Same problem. Problem is only present with text-align=center. I'll attached sample fo and pdfs. Note to self: Create a layout engine testcase for this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35918] - [PATCH] Shapes are slightly shifted with respect to lines on larger graphics
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-30 21:31 --- Created an attachment (id=15829) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15829action=view) sample FO, SVG and resulting PDF This bug is more complex than I have thought firstly. My patch helps only when using the Batik rasterizer (Batik 1.6 with patched pdf-transcoder.jar (alias fop-transcoder-allinone.jar in fop trunk)). commandline: java -jar batik-rasterizer.jar -m application/pdf bug35918.svg But if you use the FOP directly, the bug still exists. commandline: fop bug35918.fo bug35918.pdf -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35948] New: - pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948 Summary: pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is an early patch with the changes I've already made to adapt FOrayFont to Fop. Changes are mainly located in layoutmgr and pdf packages. This patch should not be applied: it is provided just in case committers want to see in the 3 next weeks what it looks like. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35948] - pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-31 02:45 --- Created an attachment (id=15830) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15830action=view) patch against source files Please don't care about changes in the classes of the layoutmgr.inline subpackage: I have overwritten them with older versions on which I worked before they were moved to the inline subpackage. Next time I'll try to apply my changes to the trunk version instead of overwriting them. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35948] - pre-patch for FOrayFont adaptation to Fop
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35948 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-31 02:46 --- Created an attachment (id=15831) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15831action=view) New files Newly created files: 2 java classes + the needed libraries from aXSL and FOray -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Bug report for Fop [2005/07/31]
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned|
| | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) |
| | +-+
| | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major |
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement |
| | | +-+
| | | | Date Posted |
| | | | +--+
| | | | | Description |
| | | | | |
| 635|Opn|Nor|2001-02-18|Doesn't support id= attribute in fo:page-sequence |
| 953|Opn|Nor|2001-03-12|Incorrect hyperlinks area rendering in justified t|
| 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files|
| 1180|New|Maj|2001-04-02|Problem with monospaced font |
| 1859|Opn|Min|2001-05-22|org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.reset() doesn't fully r|
| 1998|New|Nor|2001-06-05|linefeed-treatment not understood |
| 2150|Ass|Maj|2001-06-13|New page with a table-header but without any tabl|
| 2475|Ass|Nor|2001-07-06|Borders don't appear to work in fo:table-row|
| 2740|New|Maj|2001-07-23|multi-page tables sometimes render badly |
| 2909|New|Maj|2001-07-30|Gradient render error |
| 2964|Ass|Nor|2001-08-02|problems with height of cells in tables |
| 2988|New|Maj|2001-08-03|0.19: list-item-label does not stick to list-item-|
| 3044|Ass|Maj|2001-08-08|keep-together not functioning |
| 3280|New|Nor|2001-08-27|PCL Renderer doesn't work |
| 3305|Opn|Nor|2001-08-28|list-block overlapping footnote body |
| 3497|New|Cri|2001-09-07|id already exists error when using span=all attr|
| 3824|New|Blk|2001-09-25|MIF option with tables|
| 4030|New|Nor|2001-10-08|IOException creating Postscript with graphics on S|
| 4126|New|Nor|2001-10-12|FontState.width() returns pts instead of millipts |
| 4226|New|Nor|2001-10-17|The orphans property doesn't seem to work |
| 4388|New|Nor|2001-10-24|Nullpointer exception in the construction of new D|
| 4415|New|Nor|2001-10-25|scaling=uniform does not work on images... |
| 4510|New|Nor|2001-10-30|fo:inline common properties ignored? |
| 4535|New|Maj|2001-10-31|PCL renderer 1.13 not rendering SVG |
| 4767|New|Nor|2001-11-09|SVG text is distored in PDF output|
| 5001|New|Nor|2001-11-21|content-width and content-height ignored? |
| 5010|New|Enh|2001-11-21|Better error reporting needed |
| 5124|New|Maj|2001-11-27|fo:block-container is not rendered properly using |
| 5335|Opn|Min|2001-12-10|Text with embedded CID fonts not retrievable from |
| 5655|Ass|Nor|2002-01-02|text-decoration cannot take multiple values |
| 6094|Opn|Maj|2002-01-29|0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop|
| 6237|Opn|Nor|2002-02-05|#xFB01 (fi ligature) produces a sharp? |
| 6305|New|Nor|2002-02-07|Using fo:table-and-caption results in empty output|
| 6427|New|Enh|2002-02-13|Adding additional Type 1 fonts problem|
| 6437|New|Maj|2002-02-13|Tables without fo:table-column don't render |
| 6483|New|Nor|2002-02-15|Table, Loop, footer could not fit on page, moving|
| 6844|New|Nor|2002-03-04|No line breaks inserted in list-item-label|
| 6918|New|Enh|2002-03-06|reference-orientation has no effect |
| 6997|New|Nor|2002-03-09|[PATCH] Row-spanned row data breaks over a page wi|
| 7140|New|Enh|2002-03-15|page-position attribute set to last on condition|
| 7241|New|Nor|2002-03-19|keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on|
| 7283|New|Nor|2002-03-20|Table border misaligned when using margin-left in |
| 7337|New|Nor|2002-03-21|border around external image leaves empty space |
| 7487|New|Nor|2002-03-26|break-before=page for table inserts empty page |
| 7496|New|Nor|2002-03-26|The table header borders are not adjusted to the b|
| 7525|New|Cri|2002-03-27|table with spans inside a list-block |
| 7919|New|Cri|2002-04-10|problem to use attribute linefeed-treatment and li|
| 8003|Ass|Maj|2002-04-12|FopImageFactory never releases cached images |
| 8050|New|Nor|2002-04-13|Soft hyphen (shy;) is not handled properly |
| 8321|New|Nor|2002-04-19|from-parent('width') returns 0 for nested tables |
| 8463|New|Nor|2002-04-24|SVG clipping in external.fo example doc when rende|
| 8767|Ass|Min|2002
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35940] - 1.0dev differences to 0.20.5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35940 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-02 12:00 --- It seems that this happens, in particular, when the centered text is much shorter than the available width: for example, it is enough to add a 2cm start- and end-indent to the first block to have its text placed in a single line. Note that the 1.0 dev version creates *3* lines for that block: one with Victorian Land Index Property Address, the second with Search Result and a third empty (or so it seems) line. I think this could have something to do with the restarting mechanism in the breaking algorithm. I'll try and have a closer look at what happens during the line breaking of this block. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35992] New: - FOP Compliance page update
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992 Summary: FOP Compliance page update Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: documentation AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeremias, From fop-dev mailing list: On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 03:03 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 03.08.2005 08:32:07 Manuel Mall wrote: On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 04:52 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 02.08.2005 03:18:44 Manuel Mall wrote: ... Sounds good. Thanks a lot! WIP could be replaced by Trunk for now. Done ... If you want to start fill in stuff yourself, you could go through all the testcases in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/test/layoutengi ne/testcases/ If you want to run these testcases from the command-line, you can use the testcase2fo.xsl stylesheet in the parent directory of the above. But it's no problem if you send in your changes now. I guess it will only take me about an hour to fill in the second column. I've got a pretty good overview what works and what not. had a look at the test cases there are just too many for manual processing. I rather pick your brain first and if there are any question marks left I would be happy to investigate, write testcases, etc.. I will attach the svn patch file and also a file called skinconf.xsl which is a replacement for the file of the same name in your Forrest main/webapp/skins/pelt/ directory. Note that I am using Forrest 0.7. Happy for you to bounce it back to me after you made your changes to the trunk compliance column. And as said above happy to investigate any items you are unsure about. ... I also noticed that a number of objects and properties are marked as compliant but in the comment column is a remark indicating there is a problem with the compliance. For example: Property border-before-style is marked as compliant but in the comment it says only solid works. Isn't that a partial compliance only? Shall I update all those type of entries to partial? Yes, please, that sounds more reasonable. Done Jeremias Maerki Manuel -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35992] - FOP Compliance page update
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 10:22 --- Created an attachment (id=15860) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15860action=view) Patch to compliance page -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35992] - FOP Compliance page update
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35992 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 16:03 --- Jeremias thanks for completing the trunk column - I'll look into the yes? cases in the next day or so. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35998] New: - [PATCH] rtflib independance from FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998 Summary: [PATCH] rtflib independance from FOP Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See the threads in the fop developers' mailing-list with rtflib independance from FOP in the subject for more info. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35998] - [PATCH] rtflib independance from FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 18:33 --- Created an attachment (id=15863) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15863action=view) rough svn patch on fop-trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\render\rtf -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36000] - PDF page margins larger, different than PS rendering
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36000. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 20:01 --- I'm sure that is your print setting in Acrobat Reader: http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#pdf-print-contortion FOP has no bug in that area. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36000] - PDF page margins larger, different than PS rendering
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36000. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 20:21 --- (In reply to comment #1) I'm sure that is your print setting in Acrobat Reader: http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#pdf-print-contortion FOP has no bug in that area. It's not the just the printing of the PDF but the viewing! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36000] - PDF page margins larger, different than PS rendering
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36000. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36000 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 20:22 --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) I'm sure that is your print setting in Acrobat Reader: http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#pdf-print-contortion FOP has no bug in that area. It's not the just the printing of the PDF but the viewing! Oops. Ignore that last comment -- I was confused -- that was not supposed to post. Thanks for your help -- sorry to waste your time on this one! (but it sure helped me out) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35998] - [PATCH] rtflib independance from FOP
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 21:35 --- Merci, Guillaume. Patch applied with modifications. I've changed the generator name a bit and reconstructed the moved BorderAttributesConverter that was missing in the patch. Otherwise, your changes look good. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36004] - [PATCH] Block content in inline content
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36004. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36004 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-03 22:14 --- Created an attachment (id=15868) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15868action=view) My work on block content in inline content -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36007] New: - letter-spacing property causes ClassCastException
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36007. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36007 Summary: letter-spacing property causes ClassCastException Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The following fo: fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:svg=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master master-name=normal page-width=5in page-height=5in fo:region-body/ /fo:simple-page-master /fo:layout-master-set fo:page-sequence master-reference=normal white-space-collapse=true fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body fo:blockfo:inline letter-spacing.optimum=2pt letter-spacing.minimum=0pt letter-spacing.maximum=4ptD/fo:inlineefault/fo:block /fo:flow /fo:page-sequence /fo:root causes a java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.KnuthPenalty Exception. It only happens if the fo:inline with the letter-spacing property is the first element in the block. It also only happens for the letter-spacing property set as space as shown above, that is something like: fo:blockfo:inline letter-spacing=2ptD/fo:inlineefault/fo:block is not causing an exception. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36008] - [PATCH] letter-spacing testcases
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36008. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36008 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 04:16 --- Created an attachment (id=15873) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15873action=view) letter-spacing2.xml - Second set of tests for the letter-spacing property -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36010] - [PATCH] word-spacing testcases
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 05:08 --- Created an attachment (id=15876) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15876action=view) word-spacing1.xml - First set of test cases for word-spacing property -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36010] - [PATCH] word-spacing testcases
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 05:11 --- Created an attachment (id=15880) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15880action=view) word-spacing4.xml - Fourth set of test cases for word-spacing property -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] New: - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 Summary: Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use the second set of test cases attached to Bug #36010 as an example. When setting word-spacing=0pt (which should (nearly) be the same as word-spacing=normal or no word-spacing at all) the block is not justified. Same applies for the word-spacing=-3pt example. However, word-spacing=normal works fine as does something like fo:block text-align=justify word-spacing.optimum=6pt word-spacing.minimum=3pt word-spacing.maximum=12pt. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36015] New: - [PATCH] testcase for leaders with leader-pattern=rule
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36015. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36015 Summary: [PATCH] testcase for leaders with leader-pattern=rule Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Attached testcase file to go into test/layoutengine/testcases -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36015] - [PATCH] testcase for leaders with leader-pattern=rule
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36015. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36015 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:04 --- Created an attachment (id=15883) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15883action=view) leader-dots.xml - Set of test for leaders of type dots Doesn't seem to work for leader-pattern-width with percentage specification. Will bug separately. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36017] New: - [PATCH] testcase for leaders with leader-pattern=space
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36017. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36017 Summary: [PATCH] testcase for leaders with leader-pattern=space Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Attached testcase file to go into test/layoutengine/testcases -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:19 --- I'm not sure whether this behaviour is wrong. The recommendation (7.16.8) states that space This allows the user to specify a range of adjustments in addition to the default space between words. The minimum and maximum values specify the limits of the adjustment. Setting word-space=0pt (which means .minimum=0pt, .optimum=0pt, .maximum=0pt) you tell the application that there is no possible space adjustment, so there is no way to justify the text, unless adjusting explicitly-set letter-spacing. But I could just be wrong, is there any clarifying opinion? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36017] - [PATCH] testcase for leaders with leader-pattern=space
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36017. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36017 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:20 --- Created an attachment (id=15884) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15884action=view) leader-space.xml - Set of test for leaders of type space None of the tests current generate any leaders. Will bug separately. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36018] New: - leader-pattern=space doesn't appear to work
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36018. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36018 Summary: leader-pattern=space doesn't appear to work Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: page-master/layout AssignedTo: fop-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] See testcase attached to Bug #36017. No leaders are generated. The same file produces leaders when processed through xep. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:30 --- Luca, interesting point. It was my understanding from the reading of the spec that normal and 0pt are virtually the same: For normal: .optimum = (the normal inter-word space, as defined by the current font and/or the UA - the inline-progression-dimension of the glyph-area obtained by formatting the fo:character) / 2, .maximum = .optimum, .minimum = .optimum, .precedence = force, and .conditionality = discard. For a length: .optimum = length / 2, .maximum = .optimum, .minimum = .optimum, .precedence = force, and .conditionality = discard. These two formulas would give the same values for length=0pt assuming the normal inter-word space, as defined by the current font and/or the UA is the same as the inline-progression-dimension of the glyph-area obtained by formatting the fo:character. But when specifying normal the block is properly justified. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:38 --- The spec contains many comments that these feature are very user agent- dependant. So I think we have some liberty (or uncertainty) on how we implement this. IMO text-align=justify should probably override a restricting word-spacing setting. In this case it should probably simply contribute minimum and optimum values but not allow the maximum constraint to restrict the stretchability necessary for the justification. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36016] - leader-pattern-width=percentage gives error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:41 --- Jeremias, OK - I will treat easy on the percentages. Manuel PS: I hope I do the right thing by the project in raising all these bugs. I certainly don't want to create unneccessary noise or distractions but thought it would be best to document any problems I encountered one by one while putting those testcases together. I think I am through all the items you flagged as yes? or TODO Write test cases on the compliance page any way. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36016] - leader-pattern-width=percentage gives error
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36016 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:50 --- Manuel, don't worry, this is absolutely great! These test cases will help us improve quality in the long term and also help keep track of all the problems. I just hope noone expects us to fix all this in very short order. Especially the fact that you already provide very short test cases in the right format helps tremendously! -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 10:58 --- I'm unsure, too, but indeed, reading the thing again, word-spacing=0pt and word-spacing=normal seem to be the same. The space is in addition (!) to the normal spacing so it should not really be a real interaction with the spacing generated by text-align=justify. The spec says that there may be implementation-specific limits when word-spacing is negative. I still think that justification mostly overrides word-spacing if its restrictions cannot be met. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36010] - [PATCH] word-spacing testcases
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fop-dev@xml.apache.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 11:32 --- Maybe there is a case (although unlikely, I must admit!) which could make significant to have word-spacing=0pt != word-spacing=normal Let's suppose I want some text to be justified modifying only the letter spaces, while I desire word-spaces to have all the same width: I would easily set letter-spacing.minimum, .optimum and .maximum as I wish, and word- spacing=0pt. But if word-spacing=0pt is the same as normal, to avoid word space adjustment I should set word-spacing.minimum=Xpt, .optimum=0pt and .maximum=-Y, where X and Y are meant to undo the stretch and shrink of a word space (which are application dependent, so I could not know them). To be more clear: I thought that a word space min-opt-max values come from the size of a space character, let's call it W, according to the font; if the property word-spacing is explicitly set, then the resulting min-opt-max size is: W + .minimum, W + .optimum, W + .maximum while when word-spacing is normal we use some hard-coded, default values, obtaining: W + UA.min, W + UA.opt, W + UA.max But if I don't succeed in convincing you, I won't insist :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36011] - Setting word-spacing on justified blocks removes justification
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 11:57 --- As I said, I'm unsure about this. Simply the fact that there is an enum value normal for word-space and the default is not 0pt suggests that you're probably right and normal may indeed have a different meaning. Let's simply make sure all the variants are documented using test cases. They are so precious in discussions like these. I almost sound like I'm obsessed with test cases, but then I probably am. :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36010] - [PATCH] word-spacing testcases
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36010 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-04 12:03 --- Testcases added, thanks for your contribution -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
