On Aug 29, 2006, at 20:54, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Thanks for your support, guys. I've made some progress since last
week, but there are still some bugs well hidden here and there, and
unexpected behaviors (but also some improvements, phew).
I know the feeling... I guess the other devs know i
Thanks for your support, guys. I've made some progress since last
week, but there are still some bugs well hidden here and there, and
unexpected behaviors (but also some improvements, phew). For now I'll
take a little break and spend some time with my family. I should get
back to work in one week.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:22:22PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I'm totally ok with that. What we got from your GSoC project is worth a
> lot, not forgetting that we got someone new who really understands our
> layout engine. I think you can be proud of what you accomplished.
I agree with that.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 18:13, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Ok, I'll need a couple of additional days to finish this work.
Don't worry. Even if the patch didn't get finished before the end of
GSoC, your Wiki is already quite a piece of work (as I'm sure your
eventual patch will be).
I'm totally ok with that. What we got from your GSoC project is worth a
lot, not forgetting that we got someone new who really understands our
layout engine. I think you can be proud of what you accomplished.
On 22.08.2006 18:13:51 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Ok, I'll need a couple of additional da
Ok, I'll need a couple of additional days to finish this work.
Between a research paper and the actual code there is quite a gap...
I had some hard time trying to find a proper design, dealing with
special cases while factorizing the common code. In particular, deciding
how to handle too-short/to
Hi all,
The GSoC is over :-(
I wanted to submit a patch containing a full implementation of
before-floats before the end of the GSoC, but it turns out that this
was more difficult than expected. Currently there are plenty of bugs,
no line of javadoc, no comment, much cleanup to do, etc. But righ
