+1 from me.
Regards, Simon
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ... I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our
> transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS HEAD, ...
(Seems I overlooked this one...)
+1
Cheers,
Andreas
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
+1 from me too.
+1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems
to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues
preventing a release.
On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that
+1
On Mar 25, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
vote for a release of our transcoders.
+1
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last
> few months and seems
> to work well for most cases. I also don't see any
> other open issues
> preventing a release.
>
> On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Batik is currently pr
+1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems
to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues
preventing a release.
On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releas
Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
HEAD, we don't publish