Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-29 Thread Simon Pepping
+1 from me. Regards, Simon On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). > Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without > having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-29 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS

RE: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-29 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ... I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our > transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS HEAD, ... (Seems I overlooked this one...) +1 Cheers, Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-29 Thread Chris Bowditch
Jeremias Maerki wrote: +1 from me too. +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues preventing a release. On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote: Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-25 Thread The Web Maestro
+1 On Mar 25, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our transcoders.

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-25 Thread Glen Mazza
+1 --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last > few months and seems > to work well for most cases. I also don't see any > other open issues > preventing a release. > > On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Batik is currently pr

Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
+1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues preventing a release. On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). > Former Batik releas

[VOTE] Release Transcoders

2005-03-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6). Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS HEAD, we don't publish