Last call: Feedback on processing feedback mechanism (events)

2008-04-02 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm happy now with the processing feedback branch. The goals noted on http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback are met IMO and most event are identified and broadcast through the new event subsystem. Of course, the coverage is not 100%, yet. I'm sure there are 1 or 2 places that c

Re: Feedback on Processing Feedback

2008-01-31 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jan 31, 2008, at 08:50, Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm not sure, yet, if it's so easily possible to get the TransformerFactory from the FopFactory as it's not available everywhere. This could take some additional wiring. At first I was simply thinking about a classloader-wide setting (i.e. sta

Re: Feedback on Processing Feedback

2008-01-31 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Andreas, Jeremias, Andreas Delmelle wrote: > [Vincent:] >>> Using a TransformerFactory just to serialize data into an XML file may >>> sound a bit weird (this has nothing to do with XSLT). It appears that >>> Xerces defines an XMLSerializer class dedicated to that. > > > It's not weird at al

Re: Feedback on Processing Feedback

2008-01-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm not sure, yet, if it's so easily possible to get the TransformerFactory from the FopFactory as it's not available everywhere. This could take some additional wiring. At first I was simply thinking about a classloader-wide setting (i.e. static variable) plus a system property. After all, it's no

Re: Feedback on Processing Feedback

2008-01-30 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jan 30, 2008, at 13:01, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Hi Jeremias, Vincent, However, there's one thing in this context that is still on my list and that I want to change eventually: We have multiple places where we create a new TransformerFactory. It's always the platform default that is used.

Re: Feedback on Processing Feedback

2008-01-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Vincent On 30.01.2008 12:10:58 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > As far as I understand the event-model.xml and test-event-model.xml > files are automatically generated at build time. Is there any reason to > put them under version control then? Good catch. I guess I was confused

Feedback on Processing Feedback

2008-01-30 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Jeremias, As far as I understand the event-model.xml and test-event-model.xml files are automatically generated at build time. Is there any reason to put them under version control then? And this one is more to myself, to be sure I understand how things are working. At several places you d