Re: Footnotes handling debug

2005-06-06 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 06.06.2005 18:36:17 Luca Furini wrote: > A related question: if there is a fo:block with linefeed-treatment = > "preserve" and two consecutive linefeeds, what is the expected output? > > For example: > Text line 1. > > Text line 2. > > At the moment, there is an empty line between "Text line

Re: Footnotes handling debug

2005-06-06 Thread Luca Furini
Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Right now, that last empty block creates a block area that has a BPD of > 14400. In the end this area should collapse to a BPD of 0 so it doesn't > affect the page breaking. A footnote like this is a regular work-around > in 0.20.5 and we should have it working again. Or m

Re: Footnotes handling debug

2005-06-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Sorry, Luca. My bad. The test should have been on the flow, not in the footnote area. I've corrected it in CVS. Right now, that last empty block creates a block area that has a BPD of 14400. In the end this area should collapse to a BPD of 0 so it doesn't affect the page breaking. A footnote like

Footnotes handling debug

2005-05-31 Thread Luca Furini
I'm trying to correct the footnotes handling, as the testfile footnotes2.xml does not pass yet. I succeeded in handling a page-dependent footnote separator, with the reasonable (at least IMO) assumption that the separator bpd does not change, but there is a check I don't understand: [...]