On 08.01.2007 10:39:54 Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Monday 08 January 2007 17:20, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Interesting. You asked the same question exactly a year ago:
> > http://www.nabble.com/block-container-compliance-tf920857.html
>
> Ooops, my memory obviously doesn't extend that far back. Prob
On Monday 08 January 2007 17:20, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Interesting. You asked the same question exactly a year ago:
> http://www.nabble.com/block-container-compliance-tf920857.html
Ooops, my memory obviously doesn't extend that far back. Probably an age
thing...
>
> Looks like I/we never did
Interesting. You asked the same question exactly a year ago:
http://www.nabble.com/block-container-compliance-tf920857.html
Looks like I/we never did something about it. I'd still give the same
answer. What would need to be done is to understand the changes in the
spec from 1.0 to 1.1 concerning a
On the compliance page it indicates 'partial' for block-container in the
0.93 column but in the comments it says '[0.93] No known
restrictions.'.
Sounds a bit like a contradiction to me. What should it be?
Manuel
