Re: svn commit: r676161 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/events/model/EventModel.java

2008-07-13 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 13, 2008, at 04:07, Peter B. West wrote: Andreas Delmelle wrote: URL and URI are both used here. But I think URL is the mandatory term here. The other thing is URI Syntax which does not refer to URI itself. Since a URL is a URI, but not all URIs are URLs, I believe your example

Re: svn commit: r676161 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/events/model/EventModel.java

2008-07-12 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jeremias Date: Sat Jul 12 05:19:40 2008 New Revision: 676161 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676161view=rev Log: Attempt to fix a potential build problem. FWIW, I've locally replaced all occurrences of File.toURL() in the

Re: svn commit: r676161 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/events/model/EventModel.java

2008-07-12 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote: On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jeremias Date: Sat Jul 12 05:19:40 2008 New Revision: 676161 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676161view=rev Log: Attempt to fix a potential build problem. FWIW, I've

Re: svn commit: r676161 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/events/model/EventModel.java

2008-07-12 Thread Peter B. West
Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote: On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jeremias Date: Sat Jul 12 05:19:40 2008 New Revision: 676161 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=676161view=rev Log: Attempt to fix a potential build problem.

Re: svn commit: r676161 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/events/model/EventModel.java

2008-07-12 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jul 12, 2008, at 14:57, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 12.07.2008 14:49:03 Andreas Delmelle wrote: Going through the occurrences, I'm getting the impression that in some cases, we don't even really need the URL. The URI would do just fine if we don't need the functionality for opening a