DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9113.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello all
I've just restyled our style guide draft for the ApacheWiki and would
like to finalize this within the next two weeks. I will then clean up
the page and call for a vote. Given we reach consensus I will then
convert the Wiki page to XML and put it on our website.
(Joerg, I'm still
Victor (and others),
are you currently working in the font department? I'm asking because I
started again with code cleanup and am currently working in the font
changes I did a while ago in the branch. I just don't want to ruin
anybody's work too much. :-) thx.
Jeremias Maerki
Trying to embed FOP within Java. I added code that the documentation stated was
necessary in order to embed FOP. I compiled the code. I get errors when
instantiating the FOP Driver class. I apologize for this be lengthy.
---Executing my java
Hi Kevin
This is probably a classpath problem (NoClassDefFoundError). You've got
to make sure that fop.jar (as well as batik and friends) are on your
classpath. Example:
java -cp fop.jar;batik.jar;other-jars... embed simple.fo testembed.pdf
Look at fop.bat as another example.
Don't try to
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
are you currently working in the font department? I'm asking because I
started again with code cleanup and am currently working in the font
changes I did a while ago in the branch. I just don't want to ruin
anybody's work too much. :-) thx.
Jeremias:
Thanks for
I noticed that the recent 0.20.5rc began generating an error when you
deliver a table-cell that is not first in a table-row. The error is found
in TableCell.java of package org.apache.fop.fo.flow, line 101:
if (!(parent instanceof TableRow)) {
throw new FOPException(A table
On Friday 03 January 2003 22:19, Jarrod Stenberg wrote:
According to the recommendation a cell can exist as a child of a
table-body as well as a table-row
Yes, but only the latter is implemented and works. The error message
should prevent bad surprises.
I also noticed that the recent snapshot,
Hi all,
is the footnote are supposed to span the whole page width even
if the body region has columns? If so, adding a footnote would
cause reshuffling of content of already filled columns, which in
turn might push the FO causing the footnote onto the next page
(another candidate for the anomalous
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 3, 2003 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Footnote Problem
Hi all,
is the footnote are supposed to span the whole page width even
if the body region has columns? If so, adding a footnote
10 matches
Mail list logo