Bug report for Fop [2003/11/30]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: Properties Implementation and Canonical Mappings

Input: The XSL-FO file produced from: "DocBook: The Definitive Guide " Document size: 648 Pages // for the O'Reilly edition FO file size: 21,659,370 bytes Properties: 526,648 Tags: 285,223 Height of tree: 17 // max height of the parse tree Unique pr

String.intern() thoughts

I mentioned yesterday that I thought I had read a comment by Bruce Eckel suggesting that String.intern() might be avoided. I could not find the reference in either the 2nd or 3rd editions of "Thinking In Java". A couple of observations from some research: 1) There were some problems in Java 1.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25059] - [PATCH] LineLayoutManager: first word in line too long

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr LineLayoutManager.java

gmazza 2003/11/30 20:47:00 Modified:src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr LineLayoutManager.java Log: Hyphenation improvements from Simon Pepping (Bugs #25031 and #25059) added. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +20 -10xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/LineLayoutMan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25059] - [PATCH] LineLayoutManager: first word in line too long

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25031] - [PATCH] LineLayoutManager.getNextBreakPoss fails to add bp to vecInlineBreaks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: String.intern() thoughts

--- John Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I mentioned yesterday that I thought I had read a > comment > by Bruce Eckel suggesting that String.intern() might > be > avoided. > > I could not find the reference in either the 2nd or > 3rd editions > of "Thinking In Java". > No need-the "gotcha"

Re: Properties Implementation and Canonical Mappings

--- John Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The property strings are given to the Property > object > constructor by some path beginning with a SAX > parser. > It is reasonable to assume that the SAX parser loses > refs to most of these strings and that the Property > implementation retains the