Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto itself. Your veto makes
this situation a one against one. I have presented my reasons for the
change and therefore, I request feedback from the rest of the committers
on this matter even
On Feb 24, 2005, at 10:21 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have nothing more to say about this. I want to
spend my time on more
productive things now.
Jeremias, I'm going to veto (-1) your change. I would
like the content model restored to the XSL standard
and
Jeremias,
My veto still stands, along with the seven technical
reasons given for it.
Glen
--- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote:
>
>
> For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto
> itself. Your veto makes
> this situation a one against
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:21:25PM -0800, Glen Mazza wrote:
>
> Jeremias, I'm going to veto (-1) your change. I would
> like the content model restored to the XSL standard
> and the FONode.removeNode() method removed.
I support Jeremias' change, and vote +1.
> Technical reasons:
>
> 2.) You
Simon,
Thanks for reading and responding to my concerns. I
appreciate it. Your endorsement of this change is
sufficient for me--I am withdrawing my veto.
Regards,
Glen
--- Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 10:21:25PM -0800, Glen Mazza
> wrote:
> >
> > Jeremia
