Jeremias Maerki wrote:

On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote:

For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto itself. Your veto makes
this situation a one against one. I have presented my reasons for the
change and therefore, I request feedback from the rest of the committers
on this matter even if it's just a short message.


your change gets +1 from me.


All Jeremias was doing was changing the code to prevent a rather nasty NPE in the event of an empty fo:table-body. Surely you cannot be arguging that the NPE be restored?!?



Reply via email to