Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 25.02.2005 07:21:25 Glen Mazza wrote: <snip/>
For the moment I'm not going to answer the veto itself. Your veto makes this situation a one against one. I have presented my reasons for the change and therefore, I request feedback from the rest of the committers on this matter even if it's just a short message.
your change gets +1 from me.
All Jeremias was doing was changing the code to prevent a rather nasty NPE in the event of an empty fo:table-body. Surely you cannot be arguging that the NPE be restored?!?