Getting rid of JIMI

2004-01-22 Thread Dalibor Topic
ftware/png/ for the job, and dropping the dependency on JIMI completely? If this is a FAQ, I'm sorry for wasting your time, I couldn't find an answer in the FAQs ... cheers, dalibor topic [1] A free software runtime for java programs, see http://www.kaffe.org [2] http://www.mai

Re: Getting rid of JIMI

2004-01-22 Thread Dalibor Topic
Hi Glen, thanks for the quick reply. Glen Mazza wrote: --- Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If that's not the case, would it be possible to use the LGPLd code from http://catcode.com/pngencoder/ and http://www.sixlegs.com/software/png/ for the job, and dropping the depende

Re: Getting rid of JIMI

2004-01-23 Thread Dalibor Topic
ing behind this being that PNG image support seems to be part of JDK 1.4 anyway, so it will be implemented in free runtimes eventually as well. cheers, dalibor topic

Re: Changing policy on minimum JDK requirements for HEAD

2004-01-25 Thread Dalibor Topic
going to be moot in a year or two, since you may be able to simply use [3] gcj/gij/kaffe/sablevm on your platform of choice to satisfy your customer's needs. cheers, dalibor topic [1] Kaffe has more than 50 platforms in CVS and a few more to be merged in ;) [2] http://www.kaffe.org/~robilad

Re: Changing policy on minimum JDK requirements for HEAD

2004-01-29 Thread Dalibor Topic
soon as a free runtime covers all of FOP's needs, you automatically have another option, i.e. to switch to a free runtime. cheers, dalibor topic

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
s another solution emerged? cheers, dalibor topic

Re: Remove image.JimiImage from HEAD?

2004-10-01 Thread Dalibor Topic
fe & FOP a while ago have been encouraging. I am considering spending some time getting FOP to work on gcj, Kaffe and other runtimes, as I'd like to use it to generate man pages for kaffe using kaffe, among other things. I assume HEAD is the best place to start for an interested develop