Keiron Liddle wrote:
Personally I would like to see some sort of rotation (assuming that there will
always be 1 or 2). For example every 6 months.
Why? So the PMC becomes something that is better known and diverse than the
mystery that it currently seems to be.
This is an excellent idea.
Deperated volunteers? I can do without, I was just taking responsibility
because nobody wanted to take the first step. :-)
I really don't know. If you look here:http://xml.apache.org/management.html.
The PMC elects new members. So in theory all we can do is provide
candidates, but obviously not
Jeremias,
Without going back to the original posting, I suspect that the PMC does
not want to have to sort out candidates. It is our job to decide on two
nominations to the PMC, which the PMC intend, IIUC, to simply accept. I
haven't followed the discussion beyond that, and I nominated only
Hi Peter
On 22.01.2003 12:48:54 Peter B. West wrote:
Without going back to the original posting, I suspect that the PMC does
not want to have to sort out candidates. It is our job to decide on two
nominations to the PMC, which the PMC intend, IIUC, to simply accept. I
haven't followed
Peter B. West wrote:
[..]
In any case, it's up to us to work out who we want our representatives
on the PMC to be, and forward one or two names. That's my take on the
matter.
That's how I understand it too.
And to simplify the nomination I'm stepping back.
+1 for Jeremias and Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Common guys! I'd like to have some participation on this matter from all
the committers since this an important thing.
Sorry. I guess it is not a big deal to me. I'm sure it is important, I just
don't understand what is required well enough to determine why A would be
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Common guys! I'd like to have some participation on this matter from all
the committers since this an important thing.
Sorry a bit sidetracked.
Personally I would like to see some sort of rotation (assuming that there will
always be 1 or 2). For example every 6 months.
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Personally I would like to see some sort of rotation (assuming that there will
always be 1 or 2). For example every 6 months.
Why? So the PMC becomes something that is better known and diverse than the
mystery that it currently seems to be.
Is it appropriate for PMC? If
Christian Geisert wrote:
+1 for Jeremias and Peter
me too +1
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm for having two. Takers?
On 21.01.2003 00:12:58 Peter B. West wrote:
Next question: should we go with 1 or get another nomination?
Jeremias Maerki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm for having two. Takers?
On 21.01.2003 00:12:58 Peter B. West wrote:
Next question: should we go with 1 or get another nomination?
Ok. I'll put my hat in the ring.
Peter
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
Lord, to whom shall
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm for having two. Takers?
Yes, two is better.
I'd be happy to volunteer too.
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello there!
Ok, we've got 3 desperated volunteers. Should we vote?
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian Geisert wrote:
From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to
be a part of the XML PMC. From my experience, I think that it will
be better to have 2 people rather than one in order to share workload,
etc.
So, they want 2
I'd volunteer if nobody else wants the job.
On 20.01.2003 11:48:31 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Christian Geisert wrote:
From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to
be a part of the XML PMC. From my experience, I think that it
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'd volunteer if nobody else wants the job.
On 20.01.2003 11:48:31 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Christian Geisert wrote:
From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We ask each subproject to nominate 1 (or 2) people from that project to
be a part of the XML PMC. From my
Seems like this mail didn't make it to fop-dev.
Original Message
Subject: xml.apache.org refactoring #1
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:12:53 -0800
From: Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo
