Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-06-28 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi Rainer, Thanks alot. I have committed the patch. It all looks fine and appears to be working how it should (as far as I can see). Keiron. On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 23:42, Rainer Garus wrote: Attached is the patch for the development version of fop. Some remarks: 1) With ant version 1.4.1

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-06-27 Thread Rainer Garus
Attached is the patch for the development version of fop. Some remarks: 1) With ant version 1.4.1 ant-optional.jar is not needed. 2) There are two new files src/codegen/encodings.xml and src/codegen/glyphlist.xml. 3) I have problems building fop with xalan version 2.2D11 (see bug 9706 for ant).

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-05-16 Thread Christian Geisert
Keiron Liddle schrieb: One reason for waiting was to see how it would work. There are some user issues that have popped up but nothing too serious. It would be good to know how people should deal with this situation. A new patch would certainly help. Christian might be able to say more

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-05-13 Thread Keiron Liddle
One reason for waiting was to see how it would work. There are some user issues that have popped up but nothing too serious. It would be good to know how people should deal with this situation. A new patch would certainly help. Christian might be able to say more about this. On Sun, 2002-05-12

[PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-05-12 Thread Rainer Garus
The patch in http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=101242543132144w=2 is only inserted in the maintenance branch, not in the main branch. Is the patch not accepted for the main branch? Due to changes in the main branch, the patch does not work for the main branch in the moment without

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-01-31 Thread Christian Geisert
Arved Sandstrom wrote: Noted. Do you want to include this in the coming release ? Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-01-31 Thread Arved Sandstrom
is available and reasonably functional so we are not in a great hurry. Arved -Original Message- From: Christian Geisert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: January 31, 2002 2:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts Arved Sandstrom wrote

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-01-30 Thread Rainer Garus
References: [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=100559770232644w=2 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=100790930100949w=2 [3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm=100386481704186w=2 In fop 0.20.x unicode characters with value greater 256 not represented in the font are

RE: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2002-01-30 Thread Arved Sandstrom
Noted. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rainer Garus Sent: January 30, 2002 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts References: [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devm

Re: [PATCH] Proper use of font encodings for native fonts

2001-12-09 Thread Rainer Garus
Hi Peter, I have installed the patch to the 0.20.2RC version and tested with the fonts.fo example. There are two problems (see attached file fonts.pdf): First, the euro sign is not displayed, because of a bug in the class CodePointMapping. Not all of the unicode characters with value greater