Keiron Liddle wrote:
The only questions I have at the moment:
- are markers handled properly, you mentioned something about that
earlier so maybe it is dealt with already
- what about arbitrary xml anywhere for extensions, is that still
possible (also instream-foreign-object but that is probably
Hi Peter,
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 03:30, Peter B. West wrote:
> Fop-devs,
>
> I have just run some quick test of property generation, to determine
> whether I was actually generating the property sets for the FOs.
> Although there are obviously still some bugs in property generation, the
> full
Peter B. West wrote:
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 03:47, Peter B. West wrote:
If anyone else want to have a look I would be interested in the
results. I am particularly interested in memory usage, which, prima
facie, looks good. 9 megs total memory usage for 51 pages of FO tr
Keiron Liddle wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 03:47, Peter B. West wrote:
Rhett,
Nerver having used it, I am not aware of its capabilities. As I don't
develop in a Microsoft environment, and have no access to MS Visual C++,
and I don't run in a Solaris environment, my options for trying this ar
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 03:47, Peter B. West wrote:
> Rhett,
>
> Nerver having used it, I am not aware of its capabilities. As I don't
> develop in a Microsoft environment, and have no access to MS Visual C++,
> and I don't run in a Solaris environment, my options for trying this are
> limited.
Rhett Aultman wrote:
I have a Solaris box (Sun Blade 100) here at home, but the sources should compile on Linux, I would think. I'm actually looking at integrating a jProf library into an MBean for the JBoss project, and I did all my preliminary work on my Solaris box (some of that research will
/2002 9:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: Alt-Design: Preliminary results FO tree build test
Rhett,
Nerver having used it, I am not aware of its capabilities. As I don't
develop in a Microsoft e
Rhett,
Nerver having used it, I am not aware of its capabilities. As I don't
develop in a Microsoft environment, and have no access to MS Visual C++,
and I don't run in a Solaris environment, my options for trying this are
limited.
If anyone else want to have a look I would be interested in t
Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
Herewith the preliminary results of running the alt.design FO tree
build against the 51 page test document supplied by Bertrand.
What is included in this measurement? I presume it's fo parsing,
userconfig processing and fo tree buiding?
Yes.
It'
Hmmm...maybe we could use a JVM profiler like jProf
(http://starship.python.net/crew/garyp/jProf.html) for this?
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Tkachenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Alt-Design: Preliminary results
Peter B. West wrote:
Herewith the preliminary results of running the alt.design FO tree build
against the 51 page test document supplied by Bertrand.
What is included in this measurement? I presume it's fo parsing, userconfig
processing and fo tree buiding?
Thanks for the
file Bertrand. The
11 matches
Mail list logo
