Re: Applying the new license

2004-03-05 Thread Simon Pepping
Jeremias wrote: > On 28.02.2004 20:16:56 Clay Leeds wrote: > > It would also be nice, if there were some sort of "repository" or links > > page on the FOP site where people can go to get hyphenation files that > > cannot be included in FOP because they do not meet the needs of the > > ALv2 (assu

Re: Applying the new license

2004-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 28.02.2004 20:16:56 Clay Leeds wrote: > It would also be nice, if there were some sort of "repository" or links > page on the FOP site where people can go to get hyphenation files that > cannot be included in FOP because they do not meet the needs of the > ALv2 (assuming there are no negativ

Re: Applying the new license

2004-02-28 Thread Clay Leeds
On Feb 28, 2004, at 1:22 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Especially for the hyphenation patterns this may still be problematic because someone who does a hyphenation file conversion may not be entitled to submit it to the ASF because he is not the (only) copyright holder and license restrictions may not

Re: Applying the new license

2004-02-28 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The (documentation) sources all need a license header (docs and src/documentation). That's one part remaining. The other is the rest of the hyphenation files. But there it may not be so simple as to apply the Apache license. We will need to doublecheck the audit results and see where we can apply t

Re: Applying the new license

2004-02-27 Thread Peter B. West
Thanks for all the housekeeping, Jeremias. Jeremias Maerki wrote: I guess you'all seen the commit messages. I got a headache now, so I'll stop for the moment. Maybe I can do the rest this weekend. Only some manual work is left to do. Help is welcome. That little Java class in the committer CVS mod