Re: website
Victor Mote wrote: I see that Keiron has republished the web site. Here are some comments: 1. Keiron, would it help any, now that you have gotten the basic flow going, for one of us to take the web-site publication burden from you? I know Christian is involved in doc. If he does not wish to do it, I would be happy to run that. If reasonable, I would make an effort to publish it daily. What I don't mind at all ;-) 3. I envision the Compliance document to be a replacement for the Implemented and Limitations documents. It was built from information on those two pages, as well as a complete listing of objects properties, and the information about standard compliance levels. Is there any objection to removing these documents? I'll double-check to make sure no useful This makes sense (a comment about leader seems to be missing) Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: website
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 21:37, Victor Mote wrote: I see that Keiron has republished the web site. Here are some comments: 1. Keiron, would it help any, now that you have gotten the basic flow going, for one of us to take the web-site publication burden from you? I know Christian is involved in doc. If he does not wish to do it, I would be happy to run that. If reasonable, I would make an effort to publish it daily. What steps are required? Should we put the steps in a document (which would be visible from the web)? I realize that long-term Forrest does this automatically. I have just committed a readme with the current steps. As things progress this will change. As this is likely to change at the moment maybe we could leave it for a bit before putting on a webpage. It could be a good idea to bring together some of the procedures on a webpage, such as making a release, updating docs etc. 2. The new Compliance document is now visible at http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html. It refers to color-coding which, by passing through Forrest, we don't have yet. I'll work on either removing the color-coding reference or getting the color-coding to work. colour coding would good I think, maybe you could make a dtd enhancement suggestion. 3. I envision the Compliance document to be a replacement for the Implemented and Limitations documents. It was built from information on those two pages, as well as a complete listing of objects properties, and the information about standard compliance levels. Is there any objection to removing these documents? I'll double-check to make sure no useful information falls through the cracks. 4. The information in Compliance is probably not complete or accurate. I'm going to be culling through the mailing lists to try to get some of it cleaned up. If you see something that is not right, please either 1) fix it, 2) submit a patch, or 3) send me an email I'll fix it. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: website
Keiron Liddle wrote: On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 21:37, Victor Mote wrote: [...] 2. The new Compliance document is now visible at http://xml.apache.org/fop/compliance.html. It refers to color-coding which, by passing through Forrest, we don't have yet. I'll work on either removing the color-coding reference or getting the color-coding to work. colour coding would good I think, maybe you could make a dtd enhancement suggestion. Color coding is easily possible with chaperon, that is part of Cocoon and also Forrest (for our ongoing wiki-like editing development). Send us a RFE about it with suggestions on the DTD changes and it'll help the process, thanks :-) -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) - - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Website/design
Maybe it's a silly question, but where is the website? Thx - Original Message - From: Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: Website/design Hi All, I have updated the website and added the design docs. The design is not complete, it is only a start. Hopefully that was time well spent and will be a start to getting more information to users and developers (and casual observers). Without SLBR there is always more to do and anyone who can write qualifies. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Website/design
On 2001.12.17 12:05 Raúl Carazo wrote: Maybe it's a silly question, but where is the website? Thx Could be a problem if you don't know! All XML apache projects live under http://xml.apache.org FOP is under here: http://xml.apache.org/fop/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Website/design
It looks and reads well...definitely time well spent. Thanks. Arved - Original Message - From: Keiron Liddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:57 AM Subject: Website/design Hi All, I have updated the website and added the design docs. The design is not complete, it is only a start. Hopefully that was time well spent and will be a start to getting more information to users and developers (and casual observers). Without SLBR there is always more to do and anyone who can write qualifies. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
