> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Geisert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: June 10, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: manifest classpath (was: Re: delay for release candidate)
>
> Arved Sandstrom schrieb:
> > Christian, if it's not alr
Arved Sandstrom schrieb:
> Christian, if it's not already changed, this release would be a good
> opportunity to modify the manifest file Class-Path so that it does not
> expect JARs inside a lib/ directory. As was discussed some time back this is
> awkward for a number of J2EE servers. If nothing
Peter B. West schrieb:
> Christian,
>
> What's the latest? I have just patched .../fo/flow/BasicLink.java to
My plan was to make the RC later this evening (european time).
But I've just seen a patch from Oleg which would be nice to have in the
RC and Jeremias is working on the PS renderer.
So
Rob,
Thanks. That's exactly the sort of thing I was concerned about. I've
had a quick look around and seen nothing, so it might be better for now
to put it on hold, and mention the work-around and its possible
consequences in the release notes. Anyone else have any other ideas?
Peter
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 09 June 2002 16:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: delay for release candidate
>
> What's the latest? I have just patched .../fo/flow/BasicLink.java to
> change the default
Christian,
What's the latest? I have just patched .../fo/flow/BasicLink.java to
change the default, but I have not committed it yet. I would like to
get an interested user to try it before general release, if possible.
Peter
Christian Geisert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as you probably have notic
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: delay for release candidate
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> as you probably have noticed the date for the release candidate has been
> reached but I would like to see the following things done for 0.20.4:
> (new target date: next weekend ;-)
>
> -
> NB: I see the problem on NT4.0/sp6 -- I do not know what the results are
> on different platforms.
I can confirm that the same problems exist on Windows 2000.
Cheers,
Jeremias Märki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Tel. +41 41 317 2020 - F
At 07:50 PM 6/3/02, you wrote:
>Any other patches missing ?
Yes, alas, the change I introduced recently which improved the appearance
(ie spacing within words) in the awt renderr (command line -awt) introduces
a problem with word-to-word spacing in printing -- both when printing from
the AWTRende
I've got Oleg Tkachenko's image renderer on my tasklist. The problem is
time, as usual. I'm going to try to do this this week. I'll update you,
if I manage to do any items on your list.
There's also this one:
- Improvements on PS renderer (Huikang Xu)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=
Hi all,
as you probably have noticed the date for the release candidate has been
reached but I would like to see the following things done for 0.20.4:
(new target date: next weekend ;-)
- fix "broken" PDFs
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9054
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
11 matches
Mail list logo