force-page-count

2005-12-30 Thread gerhard oettl
hello I tried to implement the force-page-count property. It looks like someone had already prepaired many things and it looks easy, but there is a showstopper: I had no luck using the getSucceedingPageSequence function of /fop/fo/pagination/Root.java from /fop/layoutmgr/PageSequenceLayoutManager

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37639] - [PATCH] Whitespace handling revised

2005-12-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Dec 30, 2005, at 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: adelmelle Date: Fri Dec 30 05:33:18 2005 New Revision: 360083 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=360083&view=rev Log: Revision of refinement white-space handling (cfr. Bugzilla 37639) Brief description of the changes: 1) extracti

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Manuel Mall
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:38 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Dec 30, 2005, at 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Case not covered by the altered code (but I didn't think it to be a > showstopper): > > If you have: > > some inline text _ > _ > __ > > > Currently, the first series of und

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Dec 30, 2005, at 14:54, Manuel Mall wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:38 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Case not covered by the altered code (but I didn't think it to be a showstopper): Hmm, isn't that a step backwards from the status before you applied the patch? Not really. Just had to

Test case linearea_nonempty_1.xml

2005-12-30 Thread Manuel Mall
After applying the latest round of patches the test case linearea_nonempty_1.xml fails for me. Does that happen to other as well? Manuel

Re: Test case linearea_nonempty_1.xml

2005-12-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Dec 30, 2005, at 16:26, Manuel Mall wrote: After applying the latest round of patches the test case linearea_nonempty_1.xml fails for me. Does that happen to other as well? It never worked for me, but couldn't remember whether it was the intention, or did someone forget to disable it? I'm

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Manuel Mall
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:25 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Dec 30, 2005, at 14:54, Manuel Mall wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:38 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > > > > >> Case not covered by the altered code (but I didn't think it to be > >> a showstopper): > >> > > > > Hmm, isn't that a st

Re: Test case linearea_nonempty_1.xml

2005-12-30 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:35:21PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Dec 30, 2005, at 16:26, Manuel Mall wrote: > > >After applying the latest round of patches the test case > >linearea_nonempty_1.xml fails for me. Does that happen to other as > >well? > > It never worked for me, but couldn't

Re: Test case linearea_nonempty_1.xml

2005-12-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Dec 30, 2005, at 19:17, Simon Pepping wrote: But I am not happy with the way Andreas waives the failure. You should have investigated it and corrected it. If the file failed for you from the start, you should have reported it. Can you investigate whether it is OK that the empty line has disa

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Dec 30, 2005, at 16:50, Manuel Mall wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:25 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Not really. Just had to draw a line somewhere... If you do it for the last inline in a block, then you would also have to do it for the last inline of the last inline of a block etc. Besides, y

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 11:50:21PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:25 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > On Dec 30, 2005, at 14:54, Manuel Mall wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:38 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > >> I explicitly excluded fo:leaders from white-space handling, >

Re: force-page-count

2005-12-30 Thread gerhard oettl
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:32:30PM +0100, gerhard oettl wrote: >hello [...] >Because i am not very familiar with java and the >getSucceedingPageSequence function is not used elsewhere i want >to ask if it is working as expected or if i called it in a wrong >manner. i found the reason myself (the

Re: svn commit: r360083 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk: ./ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/ test/layoutengine/standard-testcases/

2005-12-30 Thread Manuel Mall
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:41 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Dec 30, 2005, at 16:50, Manuel Mall wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:25 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > >> Not really. Just had to draw a line somewhere... If you do it for > >> the last inline in a block, then you would also have to do