On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:37:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=453700
Log: (empty)
Sorry for the empty log message. I am experimenting with
subclipse. This fixes a bug that has crept in page number resolution,
viz. the text was not updated, so
I doubt anyone currently has much time to write such documentation. Yes,
the design document on the web is outdated and the Wiki does not contain
an overview of the whole layout engine. That's not so good but reflects
how many resources we have for this project. It requires that we set our
Well, given that I wrote most of the new table layout code I'd be the
one who knows exactly how it works (or at least I'm supposed to know).
Anyway, at the moment I don't know what exactly I can contribute to get
Andrejus better on his way. For getting the auto table layout feature
right, you
Summing up, this was really good. I hope we can do it again next year.
Too bad, that at the end our SVN access didn't work anymore. Someone
seemed to have changed something in the Wifi setup and HTTPS suddenly
ran through a proxy of some sort. I still have a couple of commits ahead
of me this
Actually, Type 1 embedding works for PostScript. It's just that so far
nobody needed TrueType support badly enough to do something about it.
On 06.10.2006 11:55:00 Nguyen, Thang wrote:
Could you tell me why Fop doesn't do embeding font into ps output,
what's the difficult thing in doing do so
List moderator performance for fop-users was poor this week. I have not
been able to do anything from Wednesday to Friday and nobody else
handled the moderations requests. Is this just a glitch (holiday
absences etc.) or do we need additional moderators?
Jeremias Maerki
Andrejus, I think it's best if you read all the threads here on fop-dev
on auto table layout during August if have not already done so. They
contain a lot of information about the next steps for the auto table
layout and what has been discussed so far.
Ok, thank you for pointing to right
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40583.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40699.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.