Re: Property Cache: Null Pointer Exception

Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Nov 12, 2007, at 19:10, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Hi Chris On Nov 12, 2007, at 18:29, Chris Bowditch wrote: Thanks for the prompt reply! I've now committed the check for null in the rehash method. Good! Just checked the code more closely, and I think your

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43844] - Extra blank lines added upon weird combinations of block-container, line-height and others

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Release planning

Hi devs. I think we’re just about ready for making the 1.7 release. A couple of weeks ago I went though and cleared up a bunch of bugs. All that needs to be done I think is fixing the Java 1.4 dependency in the DOM Viewer, updating to the latest pdf-transcoder, and to run regard. Hervé, were th

Re: Release planning

Hmm, probably: - Make a branch - Restore Java 1.3 compatibility - Tag the branch - Release vote Frankly, I'm not very keen on the second step. I have more pressing matters than to be able to help here at the moment. Sorry. Do you really need Java 1.3 compatibility for the PDF transcoder? I mean yo

Re: Release planning

Hi, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Hmm, probably: > - Make a branch > - Restore Java 1.3 compatibility > - Tag the branch > - Release vote > > Frankly, I'm not very keen on the second step. I have more pressing > matters than to be able to help here at the moment. Sorry. Do you really > need Java 1.3 c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43808] - Apache FOP in a Servlet fails to work after upgrade to 0.94

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43808] - Apache FOP in a Servlet fails to work after upgrade to 0.94

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Property Cache: Null Pointer Exception

Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Hi Andreas, Just looked closer, and I may have found a slightly better way of dealing with it. Since the cause of the problem is CacheCleaners interfering with rehash(), maybe the below patch is a better approach. Once rehash() has been entered, and has acquired

Re: Property Cache: Null Pointer Exception

On Nov 13, 2007, at 18:02, Chris Bowditch wrote: Hi Chris Just looked closer, and I may have found a slightly better way of dealing with it. Since the cause of the problem is CacheCleaners interfering with rehash(), maybe the below patch is a better approach. Once rehash() has been ent

Re: Release planning

Jeremias Maerki: > Hmm, probably: > - Make a branch > - Restore Java 1.3 compatibility > - Tag the branch > - Release vote > > Frankly, I'm not very keen on the second step. I have more pressing > matters than to be able to help here at the moment. Sorry. Do you really > need Java 1.3 compatibilit

Re: Release planning

Hervé Girod: > I had a crash on my laptop hardrive, but I was able to restore it (it > seemed to be some Windows stuff after all, and not a really hard crash, > but still I had to reformat and make a full reinstall of Windows, Java, > Netbeans, etc..)... Can you give me until the end of the Week

Re: Release planning

Jeremias Maerki: > Hmm, probably: > - Make a branch > - Restore Java 1.3 compatibility > - Tag the branch > - Release vote Oh, and procedurally is it OK for me to download the FOP 0.94 sources, build the pdf-transcoder.jar and commit that to Batik’s repository, or does there need to be a proper re

Re: Release planning

From my point of view, yes, absolutely. One could be a nitpicker and say that the binary didn't include the transcoder and it's not part of the release but I wouldn't go that far. The important thing is that the whole thing is done off properly released sources which don't have any legal issues and